ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Emerging tech Toolkit

AOL invests $100m in Amazon

Jim Hu and Greg Sandoval, CNET News.com CNet

Published: 24 Jul 2001 09:14 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

AOL Time Warner invested $100m (about £70m) in Amazon.com as part of a multiyear marketing agreement Monday, as the online e-tailer announced it would likely miss third-quarter revenue expectations.

Amazon will promote AOL to its customers, making the behemoth conglomerate its exclusive Internet service provider. The Seattle-based retailer will also provide AOL customers with many of the services it provides on its own site, including personalisation features and product comparisons.

The full benefits of the deal will not be realised until the 2002 holiday shopping season. That is when the companies intend to combine Amazon's shopping tools with the Shop@AOL category.

In documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Amazon said it will provide AOL with search and personalisation technology, as well as product comparisons, ratings and review services. AOL members spent $7.8bn shopping online in the three months ended June 2001.

Amazon on Monday posted a net loss of $168m, or 47 cents per share, compared with a loss of $317m, or 91 cents per share, a year earlier.

"What we're going to be doing at Shop@AOL now is combining a lot of elements of Amazon's shopping platform to enhance the experience of the users of Shop@AOL," AOL spokesman David Theis said Monday. "We will work together on future marketing initiatives. I can't give a drill-down on the future initiatives."

Under the equity investment, AOL said it has agreed to buy $100m in Amazon common stock, priced at whichever is lower: either $15.282 per share or the average closing price of Amazon stock from 24 July to 30 July, 2001. Before news of the deal was made public, AOL shares closed trading down $1.31, or about 3 percent, at $43. Amazon ended trading down 95 cents, or 5.6 percent, at $16.03.

Additional financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

Some AOL Time Warner analysts applauded the deal. The investment gives AOL a closer relationship with the undisputed leader in e-commerce.

"I think it's a way to make a strategic investment in someone you plan to do business with," said John Corcoran, an analyst at CIBC World Markets.

Other AOL Time Warner analysts were scratching their heads over the vague details of the announcement. Since financial terms were not disclosed, some analysts were unable to determine AOL's motivation for taking such a hefty stake in the struggling e-tailer.

"It would seem to me in the big-picture scheme of things that Amazon needs AOL and vice versa," said Katherine Styponias, an analyst at Prudential Securities. "I'm not sure that I understand why at this point."

Amazon has had a promotional deal with AOL since 1997, through which the retailer paid AOL millions of dollars over a number of years for premier sponsorship. AOL has been able to charge other retailers and Web media sites millions of dollars to be carried on its online service and other brands, such as Netscape, CompuServe and ICQ, to name a few.

Those deals were thought to be a way for companies to take advantage of AOL's valuable real estate. Given its more than 30 million paid subscribers, the company's population tends to spend more time on the service and more money than subscribers do on any other ISP.

But elements of typical commerce deals were missing from Monday's press release. Notably, the companies would not comment on whether Amazon would buy advertising from AOL, which is typically the way these deals are structured.

Prudential's Styponias said she has been paying a lot of attention to AOL's advertising and commerce line, which reflects the value of AOL's real estate. AOL has had to restructure agreements with other dot-coms, such as Drkoop.com and VitaminShoppe.com. Now it's a question of whether traditional advertisers will compensate for lost deals with failed dot-coms.

"Are traditional advertisers going to spend money there?" Styponias asked rhetorically. "That's what keeps me up at night watching AOL. That and their subscriber growth."

See techTrader for the latest technology business news.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 97 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:












Discussions

roger andre roger andre

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 4:27 PM

2 comments
0xyGen 0xyGen

Please help me in choosing web hosting

Sunday 20 July 2008, 10:32 AM

1 post
1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

2 comments

Blog Posts

Avatar Christian Harris

Makesureyouget.me

Sunday 20 July 2008, 6:18 PM

0 comments
Avatar roger andre

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Saturday 19 July 2008, 7:54 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

While full medical records may be of (dubious) value at rear/base medical facilities, these could be provided much simpler by either physical disk or electronic transfer to an "in theatre" database for individuals posted in. That £80m (and it's associated running costs) could have been far better employed in resuscitating a disbanded infantry battalion or providing a big boost in equipment quality and quantity.

By: 1000215420

Read full story:
Photos: MoD unveils £80m IT health programme