ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

Merced: Worth the wait? What of McKinley?

Chiyo Robertson ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 17 Mar 1999 13:54 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

While its 32-bit chip family has dominated the desktop workstation and mobile market, Merced is expected to power Intel into the high-end workstation and server space. Silencing early critics of the chip, Intel has been careful to ensure full backwards compatibility with all IA-32 applications, although the jury is out on whether they will run faster or slower on the new design.

The rocky road to IA-64

The chip has had a rocky history. In 1994, Intel teamed up with Hewlett-Packard to design a 64-bit chip and the Merced relationship has been volatile to say the least. HP got tired of having so little control and later, in 1996 decided Merced's performance was not up to scratch. Hence, the next generation IA-64 was spawned, code-named McKinley .

Well publicised delays have thrown the Merced plans way off course. Production was due to start in 1999, but analysts, wary of being too optimistic, claim 2000 or even 2001is a more realistic time frame for volume production .

But by that time McKinley will be the hot chip and Intel could well be in for a lot of criticism if confusion follows McKinley's arrival. McKinley is the code-name for second generation IA-64 processors which, according to Intel, pack twice as much punch as Merced. McKinley is due late 2001, according to Intel. Word on the street suggests Merced is more likely to be a development platform with few commercial shipments -- most will wait for McKinley.

Going cheap? Not likely

And the cost? Expensive. Analysts expect prices (per workstation unit) in the region of $3,500 to $4000 (£2,134 - £2,440). While Intel won't comment on pricing, analysts say the new 0.18 micron technology which Merced is based on, will be expensive to start with, keeping initial costs high.

FAQs

Pentium II and III currently use a 0.25 micron process. What does Merced use?

0.18 microns - moving to 0.13 microns with McKinley. The 0.18 micron process starts mid-99 so it should be mainstream by the time Merced finally arrives.

What advantages will this give the chip?

More chips per silicon wafer compared to 0.18 microns and significantly, lower power consumption. Faster clock speeds and integrated level 2 cache.

Will Merced be found in laptops and desktops?

No. Merced is targeted (initially) at the high-end market, not office desktops and laptops. That's not to say that Intel's position won't change later.

Will I need to change Operating Systems to use Merced?

Merced is designed for people who need a 64-bit environment. There is little point using IA-64 if you are not prepared to move to a 64-bit OS.

The cost?

Pricey. Merced-blessed servers and workstations will be expensive initially.

When can I see Merced?

Intel says mid-2000 - samples expected late ‘99. Analysts say volume shipments in 2001 or even later.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
55 out of 91 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Microsoft Futures

Windows 7: Mixed reviews from PDC attendees

As developers received their copies of Windows 7 on Tuesday, they offered varied reactions to the Microsoft operating system update More

Microsoft floats clouds on Windows Azure

At the Professional Developers Conference, Microsoft announced the Azure Services Platform, the company's cloud-computing platform More

Ozzie: Success of Azure comes down to trust

In an interview, Ray Ozzie says businesses will be taking a risk by placing core operations in Microsoft's datacentre, but that the software giant has more to lose if things go bad More

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.