ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Desktop platforms Toolkit

Microsoft: Linux is anti-commercial

Ingrid Marson ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 25 Nov 2005 17:30 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Microsoft asked for references to free software to be removed from a document presented at last week's UN World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) conference, the software giant admitted on Friday.

The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) is unhappy that the document was changed and claims that even though it was on the panel discussing the document, it was not made aware of Microsoft's changes.

The document, known as the Vienna Conclusions, discusses issues around IT and creativity. The original draft of the document discussed how the free software model is changing the way people do business.

"Increasingly, revenue is generated not by selling content and digital works, as they can be freely distributed at almost no cost, but by offering services on top of them. The success of the free software model is one example," stated the original document, according to the FSFE.

But the final version of the document contains no reference to free software. "Increasingly, revenue is generated by offering services on top of contents," states the final version of the document.

Thomas Lutz, the manager of public affairs at Microsoft Austria, asked for this section to be deleted as "it contains only a one-sided perspective on the ICT industry."

"The rationale for this is, that the aim of free software is not to enable a healthy business on software but rather to make it even impossible to make any income on software as a commercial product," he added.

Lutz' comments were posted on a conference blog, but Georg Greve, the president of FSFE, who was involved in drafting that section of the document, claims that no-one on his panel was aware of the blog until last week.

Greve criticised Lutz' comments as "Microsoft propaganda".

"This is so obviously stupid and nonsensical that it seems pointless to comment on it: Just another monopolist trying to uphold their monopoly by preventing freedom of markets — which is what Free Software really aims at," he said, on his blog.

But on Friday Lutz denied that the panel was unaware of these changes and confirmed that his blog postings are accurate.

"The Vienna Conclusions document was created through a democratic feedback process as requested by the committee and stated on the committee blog. Each and every participant of the conference was invited to publish contributions, share feedback and offer changes which facilitated discussion and an open exchange of positions," he told ZDNet UK. "All of our change requests were approved by the committee."

This is not the only change to the document that Microsoft brought about. In a later section of the same document, Lutz asked that a reference to the open source operating system Linux be removed as "this is only one particular — anti-commercial — specificity of the open source landscape."

Microsoft appears to have been stepping up its fight against Linux recently, with comments about open source 'dorks' and claims that Africa does not need free software.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
66 out of 126 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

29 comments

  1. Microsoft is anti-competitive. Unfortunately, the... Clay Berlo
  2. Microsofts implementation of democracy: http:... Georg Greve
  3. Any piece of software with genuine added-valu... Anonymous Coward ;-)
  4. Well, Microsoft Inc have been a wee bit... Anonymous Sheepward
  5. I wish Microsoft would just shut up... Anonymous
  6. Typical. Yet more underhanded dirty tricks from t... David F. Skoll
  7. But isn't the Vienna Conclusions document now, aft... Anonymous
  8. It is dirty tricks like these that sometimes make... Anonymous
  9. I think we might be giving MS too much credit... Matt Webber
  10. This is why F/OSS should never pull punches. Micro... Bob Robertson
  11. I'm so fed up with Microsoft's illegal practi... Anonymous
  12. Fear tactics: as long as Linux was a kitten, the a... Anonymous
  13. Whow - a new legal isuue has been born - anti... Anonymous
  14. Another reason to completely wipe MS products, suc... Anonymous
  15. OMG!! now this is bloody ridiculous, someone... Anonymous
  16. So, Anti commercial means "is better value than my... Dave Howe
  17. 'Greve criticised Lutz' comments as "Microsoft pro... bob robertson
  18. Microsoft is feeling the pinch. It brings out the... Anonymous
  19. IIf the UN is to be accepted as a reliable source... Norman Pybus
  20. "This is so obviously stupid and nonsensical that... Oldator
  21. So, not wanting to be ripped off is now considered... William Keeley
  22. In other words, they can't afford to speak honestl... pgn
  23. still trying to put the Linux and the opensou... the mooo
  24. "Anyone who wishes so should be free to share the... mad-man
  25. David, Clay, Georg etc: Do you use Micros**t produ... Neil Ashe
  26. Put your money where your mouths are. Quit using M... Neil Ashe
  27. What is democracy if a single commercially motivat... Arthur B.
  28. Neil Ashe: I'm a Computer Technician -- I have no... Clay Berlo
  29. How can microsoft call open source a socialist mov... Anonymous

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.

Featured Talkback

if the OLPC winds up as a vehicle to create a dependence on Windows for millions of poor people, the net effect for humanity will be negative. What makes it good is if it leads the users to freedom through free, freedom-respecting software.

By: mattlee

Read full story:
Negroponte: Windows key to OLPC philosophy