ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

Macromedia's flagship fails to fire

David Becker CNET News.com

Published: 24 Oct 2003 11:00 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Shares in Macromedia dropped more than a third on Thursday, after the company lowered revenue forecasts for its current fiscal year based on lower-than-expected sales of its main software package.

In reporting results on Wednesday for its fiscal second quarter, Macromedia announced it now expects revenue growth of 5 percent to 10 percent for its current fiscal year, which ends on 31 March. The company previously had forecast growth of 10 percent to 20 percent. The company also forecast third-quarter revenue of $85m (£50m) to $95m, below analyst forecasts for an average of $99m, as compiled by researcher First Call.

Macromedia chief executive Rob Burgess said initial sales have been considerably slower than expected for Studio MX 2004, the package that combines new versions of major Macromedia Web design and development tools, such as Flash and Dreamweaver. "The uptake rate for MX 2004 has been a lot slower in the first few weeks than we expected and certainly than we've experienced in the past," Burgess said during a conference call with financial analysts late on Wednesday.

Burgess attributed the slow start to a cautious overall information-technology spending environment and Macromedia-specific factors, such as the decision not to offer a free trial version before the product's release as the company had done in the past. Burgess also cited success in moving customers to subscription programs that create more deferred revenue. "That's actually good for the longer term," he said.

The news led to several analyst downgrades and sent Macromedia shares skidding. The company's stock was down $9.43, or 34.8 percent, to $17.70 in midday trading on Thursday.

Investment bank Adams Harkness & Hill cut its rating on Macromedia from "strong buy" to "buy," with analyst Steve Frankel criticising the company's decision not to offer a free demo version of Studio MX 2004 before release. "The lack of prerelease evaluation copies was in retrospect a management misstep and sets the upgrade cycle back by 30 days," he wrote in a research note. Investment bank Robert W Baird also cut its rating on Macromedia, from "outperform" to "neutral."

Macromedia reported net income of $9.8m, or 14 cents a share, for its second quarter, which ended on 30 September. That compares with a loss of $11.7m, or 19 cents a share, in the same period a year ago. Sales were $89.9m, compared with $85.9m a year ago.

Macromedia also announced plans to acquire eHelp, a privately held software maker specialising in tools for creating technical tutorials and other training presentations. Macromedia said it expects eHelp's RoboHelp and RoboDemo products to integrate well with existing Macromedia products such as Breeze, the company's new tool for creating and delivering online training material. The cash-and-stock transaction is valued at about $65m.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
74 out of 142 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Exchange Engineer

The company's stock is traded on the New York (NYSE: EDS) and London stock exchanges. With more than $21 billion in annual revenue, EDS is ranked ...

Backup Engineer

The company's stock is traded on the New York (NYSE: EDS) and London stock exchanges. With more than $21 billion in annual revenue, EDS is ranked ...

Infrastructure Engineer ( Novadigm Radia )

The company's stock is traded on the New York (NYSE: EDS) and London stock exchanges. With more than $21 billion in annual revenue, EDS is ranked ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

harpless harpless

SAP goes big business

Friday 25 July 2008, 6:17 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Will Drizzle rain on Sun's MySql

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:30 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

8 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment