Typo leads to Vista SP1 confusion
Published: 20 Jul 2007 09:55 BST
Microsoft claims an error in a email led to reports that it has released a trial version of Vista Service Pack 1 when, in fact, no date has officially been confirmed for its launch.
The confusion began on Tuesday when website WinBeta.org posted an email from Microsoft's Windows Driver Kit (WDK) team saying Microsoft had released a beta version of Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1).
"A new beta WDK build is now available for download on Connect," said the email. "This WDK beta release to Connect coincides with the recent OS beta release for Vista SP1 Preview."
Vista Upgrade Blog
Grappling with the OS
How is the switch to Vista affecting your workplace? Take a look at our new group blog and share your pain and praise.
News agencies and bloggers picked up on the post, prompting the WDK team to update the email on Wednesday, saying that the original had featured a typographic error — the build available being for the upcoming Windows Server 2008.
"Apologies all. We made a typo in the last notification that went that referenced the wrong OS," said the second email from the WDK team. "We didn't mean to imply or cause any confusion on the availability of the service pack for Vista. The WDK build available now on Connect is the latest for Windows Server 2008."
Microsoft further clarified its position on Thursday, when it sent this statement to ZDNet.co.uk:
"There will be a Windows Vista service pack but it's too early to discuss specifics on timing. Service packs are part of the traditional software lifecycle. They're something we do for all Microsoft products as part of our commitment to continuous improvement, and providing early test builds is a standard practice that helps us incorporate customer feedback and improve the overall quality of the product. The team is working hard on the service pack, and our current expectation is that a beta will be made available sometime this year."
Did you find this article useful?
12 out of 12 people found this useful
- Share this article:
