ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

OpenDocument threat emerges in Massachusetts

Martin LaMonica CNET News.com

Published: 03 Nov 2005 17:05 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Massachusetts Senate has introduced a provision to an economic stimulus bill that endangers a state decision to standardise on the OpenDocument format.

An amendment to Senate bill 2256, published on Wednesday, proposes the creation of a four-person information technology task force to approve technical standards in the state. The Senate is scheduled on Thursday to discuss the bill, known as the Commonwealth Investment Act.

The introduction of the amendment follows a hearing on Monday where the chair of a state Senate watchdog committee, Marc Pacheco, criticised a decision by the IT Division of Massachusetts to standardise on OpenDocument, an open document format for desktop productivity applications.

In a closely watched move, the IT Division of Massachusetts finalised a policy last month that mandates that products used by agencies in the executive branch comply with the OpenDocument standard, which is also called the Open Document Format for Office Applications, or ODF.

By using the OpenDocument standard, the IT Division said that state documents will be readable hundreds of years from now. The chief information officer, Peter Quinn, also said that a move to OpenDocument-based products will save the state money.

Sun's StarOffice suite complies with the OpenDocument format and many other companies, including IBM, Novell, Adobe and smaller firms, have voiced their interest in the format. Microsoft, by contrast, said it does not intend to support OpenDocument natively in its dominant Office suite.

At the hearing on Monday, Pacheco criticised the process behind IT Division's decision. He questioned the division's authority to set state policy on technical standards.

Also at the hearing, the state supervisor of public records, Alan Cote, condemned the move, claiming it could result in lost electronic records.

The General Counsel of the IT Division, Linda Hamel, argued at the hearing on Monday the division has authority to set standards and that the CIO's office has sought to work with other state agencies to set its overall policies.

Some observers said that the IT Division's decision has caused a stir in part because of Massachusetts politics. One government official on Monday said there is a turf war over electronic records between the IT Division, which reports to the Secretary of Administration and Finance, and the public records office, which reports to the Secretary of the Commonwealth.

The bill, if adopted, would impose an added approval step to state policy decisions.

"An executive agency or department shall not adopt or implement a policy, practice or standard concerning information technology standards or systems or the procurement or use of hardware, software, and cellular phones and other electronic devices, without the affirmative approval of the task force by majority vote," the bill states.

The four task force members would be appointed by the governor and at least two of them will be representatives from the business community.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
59 out of 127 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Performance Test Analyst

Defence Provides secure access to information, anywhere at any time Provides electronic document and records management Enables any corporate, ...

QA Team Leader

NO AGENCIES With an expanding domestic and global market, and revenues increasing month on month, critical strategic change is on the agenda, in ...

Lead Systems Architect

Assists leadership in determining tactical and strategic direction of the division/organization. Monitors market trends and the work of standard ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

harpless harpless

SAP goes big business

Friday 25 July 2008, 6:17 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Will Drizzle rain on Sun's MySql

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:30 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Show me the money!

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:18 PM

5 comments

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

7 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment