Getting real results from virtual machines
Published: 21 Oct 2005 14:35 BST
... the value to the customer and move the industry forward together. You start needing standards. We'll be 8 years old in January and we have a lot of experience, and we see some of the directions we think are architecturally suboptimal. So we're taking what we believe are the interfaces, the standards that will allow the whole industry to work together on this in a productive way, and we're opening them up and sharing them with the industry. We don't see any reason why we won't be working with Xen and Microsoft.
I talked to Xen and I talked to Microsoft and they didn't seem to have any interest in adopting your standards.
Yeah, I don't understand why that wouldn't be, given the depth of experience we have, the years of shipping product, working with customers, the fact that we've built, over the years, three different architectures for this virtualisation technology. I think we understand what works quite well, and we're being open and no-strings-attached about how we share this with the world.
Perhaps if you're as powerful as Microsoft and have the ability to set a different standard, that would undermine [VMware's] market power. Whereas, if Microsoft adopted your standard for the underlying technology, that would serve to cement VMware's leadership by making what has been a de facto standard into an industry standard. If Microsoft comes up with some different standard, ships it with every version of Longhorn Server, maybe that will become the de facto standard instead.
I don't think that's the most productive for the industry, and I don't think it's the ideal scenario for the customers. I believe that everybody is going to win if we all work together on these standards. Microsoft has shown in recent years that they're more interested in doing what the customers want. It would be great if Microsoft would work with us on that.
Why didn't you do the standards move earlier?
Nobody came to us and asked us to do these things; this was a proactive thing on our own part. I think IBM and some of our partners are very standards oriented.
I was talking to a server executive at HP, the largest x86 server maker. He said the base virtualisation layer that lets you run multiple operating systems should be free. Do you agree?
Whatever you sell, you want to get enough money to invest in R&D. In VMware we have...
For more, click here...
Previous
Did you find this article useful?
364 out of 680 people found this useful
Digg
Slashdot
Del.ici.ous
Stumble
Reddit
Full Talkback thread
1 comment
