ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Thinking of ditching IE? Think again

Jonathan Yarden

Published: 18 Oct 2005 18:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Long before Internet security became a mainstream concern, many users chose to dump Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) and switch to other Web browsers, most notably products from Netscape. And given IE's chequered security history, that trend continues — particularly thanks to the growing popularity of the Firefox browser.

However, while I'll be the first to criticise Microsoft, I'll also say that companies shouldn't be so quick to look to alternative Web browsers. As anyone who has switched to an alternative Web browser has discovered, security isn't always the only issue. Companies often focus so intensely on security that they manage to overlook areas that are just as vital — such as functionality.

It's an undeniable fact that IE sports some functionality that simply isn't present in other Web browsers. In addition, a considerable number of Web sites don't function properly if you're not using IE to access them.

Over the years, Microsoft has adamantly maintained that IE is a part of Windows — not an add-on. In fact, the software giant has spent a great deal of time and money ensuring that users can't easily remove IE from Windows. (It is, however, much easier to disable IE on your system.)

If your organisation has decided that using IE on a regular basis exposes it to security risks, it's not necessarily wrong. The majority of browser-hijacking malware targets IE — and for good reason. Hackers are taking advantage of features designed to make IE more extensible to create malware that takes over the operation of IE.

For example, a primary way that spyware and adware infest a Windows system is via the use of the Browser Helper Objects (BHOs) that alter IE's behaviour. This is another case of the common conflict between functionality and security — to the detriment of average users.

The security of the Web browser itself is often a primary motivation for searching for an IE replacement. In the past, exploitable programming errors in IE have resulted in viruses and other malware infesting a Windows system.

But this is the point where most organisations go astray in their logic: They assume that switching to an alternative browser will keep them safe. Yet, just because IE has suffered from security issues before doesn't guarantee that a replacement Web browser won't experience similar issues.

Yes, IE is a common target for hackers, but that's primarily due to its...

For more, click here... 

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
106 out of 219 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

Security Test Engineer

A leading publishing house is searching for a Malware Security Test Engineer to assist with the ever increasing workload and expanding business. ...

ASP Web Developer with e-commerce experience needed in Swindon

Huxley Associates are searching for a candidate with experience in ASP web development to work on a range of client web sites. They need a web ...

Solution Design - pre sales - Architect - Routing Switching & IPT

Amazing opportunity for an experienced commercially focused technical consultant to take a leading role in the solution sales lifecycle. In this role ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation