Advertisement
Promo

Compliance Toolkit

Patent campaigners make government breakthrough

Matt Loney ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 14 Dec 2004 17:00 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

At the end of a raucous meeting in London on Tuesday, the minister for science and innovation, Lord Sainsbury, and the UK Patent Office agreed to consult further on the pivotal issue of what should constitute 'technical contribution' when used to decide whether a particular software patent should be granted.

The European Software Patents Directive, which has not yet been finally approved by Europe's politicians, will allow patents for software that can demonstrate a 'technical contribution' and which satisfy the tests of obviousness that other patent applications have to pass. Software that does not demonstrate a technical contribution will not be patentable, say the backers of the directive, which include the UK Patents Office and Lord Sainsbury, who has helped steer the legislation through.

Critics say the directive does not do enough to define what is meant by technical effect, and fear it will lead Europe towards the US situation where software is widely patented.

The laughs from the audience of experienced software developers in the DTI Conference Centre on Tuesday, as representatives of the UK Patent Office tried to in vain to make the distinction, appeared to convince Lord Sainsbury that more work needs to be done here.

Mooting the idea of a seminar on the issue of technical contribution, Lord Sainsbury said: "We will see if we can do some more work on technical contribution. It would be useful for us to get some more views, even if after this legislation is passed, on how we interpret that. This is key to the whole issue."

But Sainsbury stopped short of saying that it would be possible to affect the legislation itself, and hinted that only those who were in Tuesday's meeting would be invited to any further meeting on the issue. The Patent Office restricted places in Tuesday's meeting to those who had written to their MPs on the issue, and even many of those did not receive invites. Any further meeting is likely to be similarly restricted, said attendees.

Tim Jackson, a developer with London-based Premier IT Group, said the problem is that there is no definition of what constitutes technical contribution. "There has been a very low barrier," he said. "This directive will allow software patents."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
88 out of 164 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Cloud Watch Special Report

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Analysis The cloud is providing a fertile habitat for the marketeers and their exaggerated claims. We examine the hokum and debunk the five most frequently peddled misconceptions about the cloud

More Special Reports

Sentry Posts Blog

Behind the Scenes: Next Gen Mobile Tec...

Behind the Scenes: Next Gen Mobile Technology Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com With infrastructure speeds continually improving at the network level of the world’s leading... More

Post a comment

Nasa hacker petition presented to Numb...

Sting's wife Trudie Styler and Janis Sharp have presented a petition to Number 10 calling for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon not to be extradited to the US. Styler, and Sharp, who is... More

Post a comment

UK to appoint cyber-sec tsar?

The UK is to appoint a cyber security tsar along the lines of the US, according to a story in the Telegraph this morning. The story is similar to one that appeared in the Guardian... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters