ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

Gartner's dire predictions tempered by META group

Isabelle Chan CNETAsia

Published: 29 Nov 2004 09:30 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Software costs will continue to increase but not at the rates projected in recent industry reports, according to research firm META Group.

In a study issued last week, Alan Butler, a research director with Gartner, said software licensing costs will rise by more than 50 percent in the next two years, due to emerging hardware trends like the move to multi-core chip architectures and virtualised hardware.

However, Kevin McIsaac, META Group's research director for Asia-Pacific, said the cost increase would be much lower.

"We don't see software costs spiralling out of control. In fact, our research shows that software costs will grow at just about 10 percent per annum," he told ZDNet UK sister site CNETAsia.

While Gartner's Butler urged users to protect themselves from the rising costs by renegotiating existing contracts with their vendors, McIsaac said users would be able to manage their costs better if they took a different perspective.

"Since software is the second biggest cost after people, users should start looking at managing software as a real asset," he noted. People account for about 45 percent of the total data centre costs, while software, the second biggest component, makes up between 30 percent and 35 percent.

McIsaac emphasised the importance of understanding what software is really used and what can be eliminated, as well as how the licensing model interacts with technologies like multicore and partitioning or virtual machines.

"They need to exploit these technologies to control or reduce costs," he noted.

As an example of better planning, McIsaac said: "If I have four systems with four CPUs, and the vendor charges per CPU, then I pay for licences for 16 CPUs. If these systems are only used 20%, perhaps I can 'consolidate' to one system with 6 CPUs, using virtual machines or partitions, and reduce my licence costs by paying for 6 CPU licences."

Although the future direction of licensing models remains unclear, there are signs of good news for users, such as Microsoft's decision to recognise a multi-core CPU as a single processor.

"It's a matter of time before the other software vendors follow suit," McIsaac said.

And in response to the growing interest in rapid provisioning tools, which help improve the utilisation of hardware resources, IBM has changed its current practice of requiring its customers to pay for all the CPU licences for the full year.

"IBM is offering per-use CPU licensing, so that a customer can pre-purchase a block of CPU days for a particular piece of software. As they activate additional CPUs to deal with temporary workload spikes, then deactivate, the customers only have to pay for the usage of the software during that period of the spike," said Han Chung Heng, the general manager for IBM Singapore's Systems and Technology Group.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
74 out of 138 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Related Jobs

Director Level 100k +

Pharmacovigilance Director (Dublin), Salary Negotiable. This is an excellent opportunity to further your career within Pharmacovigilance at Director ...

Director of Quality Assurance and Compliance, Pharmaco, Berkshire

Director of Quality Assurance and Compliance, Pharmaco, Berkshire Director of Quality Assurance and Compliance: My client is a leading Pharmaceutical ...

NHS - Director - Contract - Healthcare - East Midlands - Apply!

An NHS organisation is looking for a: Highly motivated individual who can aid them with their; 1) Strategic Planning 2) Service Modernisation 3) ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

harpless harpless

SAP goes big business

Friday 25 July 2008, 6:17 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Will Drizzle rain on Sun's MySql

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:30 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

8 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment