ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Outsourcing Toolkit

Why killing 80,000 desktops is worse than careless

Andrew Donoghue ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 26 Nov 2004 15:15 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

What do you see as the alternative to these massive outsourcing deals?
We [The Liberal Democrats] and the select committee have argued that you need a smaller scale, more manageable contract –- bigger is not always better. By going up to these mega-contracts you take certain risks and one of those is that there are only a small group of suppliers who can bid in for this work so you are left with a less competitive market. But also you are left with a risk that if something does go wrong it goes wrong more dramatically then where you have networks of people responsible for things in bite-sized chunks.

The other thing we have called for is for there to be far more in-house expertise. For any organisation to think that it can put all its IT out is a mistake, they have got to keep in-house expertise as well. On something like this you are wondering who took the decision to push the button.

Are we going to see more problems of this kind given the Government's commitment to slash civil service headcount and rely more and more on technology?

You need people -- the idea that you can cut people out altogether is a mistake. There is a lesson that if you are going to try to depend more on technology you need more technologists. I think the problem is that they are trying to do both at the same time. They are trying to save on the general staff by introducing more technology but also save on the technical costs by going for these cut-to-the-bone contracted-out things.

As they move to becoming more technology dependent, the question that has to be asked is are they doing enough to support the technology? Or are they going for low-cost contracts on a massive scale that aren't going to deliver the kind of quality that they need? And the more dependant you are, the higher quality the service needs to be.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
186 out of 375 people found this useful


Related Jobs

Quality Lead - Unilever - Level C-00055185

Job Purpose: This is a vacancy to work on one of Accenture's largest outsourcing deals. Ability to build strong and respected relationships with a ...

Applications Management Analyst-00053787

Escalate issues and risks to line management Client and Customer Responsibilities Establish and develop positive working relationships with the ...

Contract Analyst - Warrington-00054434

Key Responsibilities Responsible for the management and delivery of complex and medium risk contracts and provide support to the business or client ...

Discussions

187205 187205

Companies to react to downtime

Thursday 24 July 2008, 2:51 PM

1 comment
pearce_jj pearce_jj

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 2:19 PM

13 posts
David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

13 posts

Featured Talkback

Software development for instance can be off shored with a perceived reduction in development costs but the resulting code is rarely of good quality and there is much greater expense in reworking and support over the life of software developed in this way. As a consultant who has to deal with off shoring on daily basis I very often see no savings at all over the lifetime of a software product, and in some cases actually see projects costing a fortune to rework.

By: pround

Read full story:
Offshoring behind UK tech-labour divide