Advertisement
Promo

Office applications Toolkit

PeopleSoft upsets merged customers

Alorie Gilbert CNET News

Published: 29 Jul 2004 11:05 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

PeopleSoft is also on target this year to reach its goal, set in September, of cutting $167m to $207m in duplicative costs as a result of the merger, Gupta said.

Communications breakdown
Yet relations with some J.D. Edwards customers -- the small ones in particular -- are strained. A chief complaint is that PeopleSoft has communicated poorly about new licensing and maintenance models that it's pushing J.D. Edwards customers to accept.

Appetisers And, a 400-person food manufacturer in Chicago, worries that PeopleSoft's pricing schemes could bust its IT budget. PeopleSoft charges separately for products that J.D. Edwards had thrown in as part of a package, said Kerry Christianson, an Appetisers And manufacturing analyst.

In addition, the company is unlikely to get a discount on its upgrade project. PeopleSoft only offers discounts to customers that spend $100,000 or more on the project, Christianson said. Appetisers And plans to spend less than half that amount.

"I don't know if they really understand the smaller customer, which was J.D. Edwards' bread and butter," Christianson said.

Customers have the option to keep the same terms they had with J.D. Edwards, Gupta said, even though PeopleSoft does want customers to sign up for its standard pricing model.

A disenchanted base of small and midsized customers would be a major defeat for PeopleSoft, which acquired J.D. Edwards in part for its relationships with such companies. Many software makers, including SAP and Microsoft, are eyeing sales to midsized businesses as the potential antidote to tepid demand from large, multinational corporations.

Yet PeopleSoft may have fanned the flames of discontent when it snubbed Quest, a large J.D. Edwards user group. Looking to streamline its user group activities, PeopleSoft pulled its speakers from Quest's annual conference after a disagreement over the terms of its participation in the event.

"I think that poisoned the well to a certain extent," technology analyst Greenbaum said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
376 out of 699 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Video icon

Video

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010

Discussions

Shibley R Shibley R

Question!

Friday 25 December 2009, 11:09 AM

1 comment
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Thursday 24 December 2009, 3:37 PM

5 comments

Vista Upgrade Blog

How to Upgrade From Windows Vista to W...

Did you get the news? Microsoft has unzipped its kitty and kept its latest, supposedly the best, offering on display. This is the brand new version of Microsoft operating system, named... More

Post a comment

Tinsel on the TARDIS

There were shepherds on the hill, and the Doctor popped his head out of the TARDIS and said "you might want to see this" and they were astounded. WHY do we pay for a TV license?... More

Post a comment

Can I have fries with that? (Consumer...

Licence policies of Tech company's have been for a long time both complicated and 'Dick Turpin-esque', people just click 'I agree' without reading the Agreement. I do the same, but... More

1 comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters