Advertisement
Promo

Office applications Toolkit

Home Office promises national intelligence system

Published: 23 Jun 2004 11:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Home Office has pledged to improve the way police handle sensitive intelligence by implementing a national intelligence system and enforcing a nationwide code of practice for police information handling.

The pledge came from Home Secretary David Blunkett in response to the publication on 22 June by Sir Michael Bichard of his findings into the way the investigation of Soham murderer Ian Huntley was carried out by Cambridgeshire and Humberside police.

Sir Michael's report included several recommendations on ways to improve information handling and sharing by police forces in England and Wales, including the introduction of a national intelligence system "as a matter of urgency" and a code of practice on creating, keeping and sharing information.

Sir Michael also called for a review of the efficiency of existing IT procurement procedures, to ensure national IT systems are being delivered where appropriate. If a national IT system is appropriate, "it makes no sense to allow local forces to frustrate or delay its development," he said.

The Home Secretary said he accepted all the recommendations by Sir Michael and has announced the first national police intelligence computer system, called Impact, as well as use of an interim, local exchange system to flag up intelligence being held by particular police forces and a statutory code of practice to cover information handling by the 43 police forces of England and Wales.

Scotland already has a centralised database to handle intelligence information and there have been calls to use the Scottish system as a base for the proposed national system for England and Wales, rather than beginning development from scratch.

Sir Michael said data protection laws could not be blamed for the failures in the Soham investigation and said he did not believe radical revision of the existing laws was necessary.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
68 out of 112 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Discussions

sjh777 sjh777

Copper tax?

Thursday 10 December 2009, 1:16 PM

1 comment
lucadematteis lucadematteis

3 reasons I won’t give up my iPhone

Thursday 10 December 2009, 12:03 PM

5 comments
1000088037 1000088037

Another 'THE SKY IS FALLING!'...

Thursday 10 December 2009, 11:56 AM

1 comment
dres dres

o_O

Thursday 10 December 2009, 11:35 AM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Tinsel on the TARDIS

There were shepherds on the hill, and the Doctor popped his head out of the TARDIS and said "you might want to see this" and they were astounded. WHY do we pay for a TV licence?... More

Post a comment

Can I have fries with that? (Consumer...

Licence policies of Tech company's have been for a long time both complicated and 'Dick Turpin-esque', people just click 'I agree' without reading the Agreement. I do the same, but... More

1 comment

This Crap Site

How utterly stupid - I am ranked #40 in the top 100 - as a member of this site..... I mean HOW utterly stupid.... I have done sweet FA, I have only rejoined this site after a 3 or... More

2 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters