Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

Windows sidelined by Fedora bug

Stephen Shankland CNET News.com

Published: 09 Jun 2004 08:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Red Hat's newest hobbyist and developer version of Linux, Fedora Core 2, caused trouble for some who found they couldn't start Windows after installing the Linux upgrade side by side with it.

The bug had cropped up in testing, but after Red Hat released Fedora Core 2 in May, many more users reported their systems no longer would boot Windows.

No data on the Windows side was destroyed, and some manual hard drive reconfiguration fixed the problem.

"We do not think this is a severe problem," said Red Hat programmer Cristian Gafton in an email interview, because information isn't destroyed, the problem is repairable, and "a very small fraction of systems are affected."

However, he added, "we recognise that it is an annoying issue for the users that are affected by it and we are working on publishing a fix that will address it."

Fedora Core is designed to satisfy the appetites of those who want the latest software while maturing Linux improvements more quickly for use in the corporate product, Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The company makes no pretences to Fedora's stability; the Web site includes the disclaimer, "the Fedora Project is not a supported product of Red Hat."

Until 2002, Red Hat offered an identical version of Linux as a free, unsupported download or as a paid product with support. Now only Fedora Core 2 is available for free, while Enterprise Linux, which changes more slowly, costs between $349 and $18,000 (£190 and £ 9,800) per one-year support subscription.

The problem with Fedora Core 2 apparently had to do with changes made to a computer's description of the physical layout of its hard disk, data called the partition table, Gafton said.

In some cases, Fedora Core 2 would use a different convention to record the information, and Windows XP wouldn't recognise the disk. In other cases, the problem stemmed differences in how Windows, Linux and a computer's BIOS -- basic input-output software used in the early stages of starting a computer -- handle the partition table information, Gafton said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
60 out of 86 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Video icon

Video

Microsoft Futures Special Report

Ozzie: Success of Azure comes down to trust

Ozzie: Success of Azure comes down to trust

News In an interview, Ray Ozzie says businesses will be taking a risk by placing core operations in Microsoft's datacentre, but that the software giant has more to lose if things go bad

More Special Reports

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters