Advertisement
Promo

Office applications Toolkit

IBM nurtures biological growth

Karen Southwick CNET News

Published: 01 Jun 2004 11:55 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

In early 2000, IBM research executives Carol Kovac and Jeff Augen were kicking around the notion of how the company could play a larger role in the fast-growing life sciences arena.

Although IBM had scientists working in the field, "it was pure research," said Augen, who at the time was director of emerging technologies. There was a considerable gap in translating that research into sales of equipment and services to the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.

So Augen and Kovac, an IBM research vice president, put together an aggressive plan to get to $100m (£54m) in revenue in the first year and turn cash-flow positive by the third year. Those goals were met, Augen said, as they grew revenue by $500m in just two years.

"We at IBM believe that within the next three to five years, the transformation of health care will be under way," Kovac said, offering "probably the greatest new market opening in IT that we see on the horizon."

Already, IBM Life Sciences is a $1bn-plus business that recently merged with the company's older health care division, which served providers and payers. Kovac, named general manager of the combined operation, said IBM was able to take advantage of a historic development in health care: the sequencing of the human genome in June 2000. Presciently, she and Augen had formed IBM Life Sciences only a couple of months before, in late March.

As successful as it has been so far, however, IBM Life Sciences faces substantial competition. The company lost critical time in bringing its technologies from the lab to the marketplace, falling behind Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard and other major rivals. In addition, all these companies must compete with others that have specialised in this field and have established strong partnerships with health care organisations for decades.

Some analysts predict an uphill battle for IBM because the health care industry needs software applications, not the kind of hardware-oriented technologies that the company is generally known for. "What does it really mean for them to be committed to health care?" said Barry Hieb, a Gartner research director specialising in health care. "The real value is in applications, which are Cerner or Siemens or Accelrys."

Next

Previous

1 2 3 4 5


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
268 out of 592 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. IBM will throw their weight around, and make prog... Kikki Bona Sijabat

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Video icon

Video

Discussions

Xwindowsjunkie Xwindowsjunkie

SiO2 is cheaper than Cu

Friday 18 December 2009, 8:00 AM

4 comments
CA CA

Copyright in a new light

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:54 AM

2 comments
CA CA

Inventions and Product Design

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:35 AM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

How to Upgrade From Windows Vista to W...

Did you get the news? Microsoft has unzipped its kitty and kept its latest, supposedly the best, offering on display. This is the brand new version of Microsoft operating system, named... More

Post a comment

Tinsel on the TARDIS

There were shepherds on the hill, and the Doctor popped his head out of the TARDIS and said "you might want to see this" and they were astounded. WHY do we pay for a TV license?... More

Post a comment

Can I have fries with that? (Consumer...

Licence policies of Tech company's have been for a long time both complicated and 'Dick Turpin-esque', people just click 'I agree' without reading the Agreement. I do the same, but... More

1 comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters