Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

Microsoft gears up for another antitrust battle

Karen Southwick and Charles Cooper CNET News

Published: 19 Dec 2003 13:55 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Just when you thought Microsoft might have been nearing the end of a long series of antitrust suits, another one surfaces with RealNetworks' accusation that the software giant illegally used its Windows monopoly to limit consumer choice in digital media.

That same monopoly has been at the root of lawsuits by the federal government, many of the states, the European Union and several private companies, including Sun Microsystems, Be, and Time Warner's Netscape subsidiary. Although most of the settlements have been largely favourable to Microsoft, the lawsuits soaked up resources and bandwidth, not to mention tarring the company as a monopolist.

Ironically, though the Windows monopoly has been the motor of Microsoft's stunning financial success, it has also gotten the company up to its neck in legal hot water over the years.

The Windows operating system has become the centrepiece of Microsoft's technology strategy -- for everything from the company's relatively late move into the Internet to more recent forays into music and streaming video and audio.

But rivals have long bridled at Microsoft's habit of incorporating new features into Windows that were previously supplied by standalone applications. Microsoft contends that the development of Windows reflects technology improvements that make it easier for customers to operate their computers.

This is less an argument over setting digital boundaries than about the measures Microsoft must take to protect its crown jewels.

The dizzying array of lawsuits against Microsoft include:

  • In 1997, the Clinton administration accused the company of violating an earlier antitrust settlement from 1995. The allegations focused on the browser war between Netscape's Navigator and Microsoft's Internet Explorer. Among other charges, the government said Microsoft was forcing computer makers to install IE if they wanted Windows 95.

    Under terms of the trial judge's order in November 2002, Microsoft agreed to give computer makers more flexibility in configuring Windows and to share more details about Windows' inner workings with other software makers. In November of this year, a federal appeals court took up the case yet again, hearing testimony on whether the remedies imposed on Microsoft have been effective. The court's ruling on whether to approve the order or toss it out in favour of harsher penalties is pending.

  • Next

    Previous

    1 2


    • Email
    • Trackback
    • Clip Link
    • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

    Did you find this article useful?
    79 out of 179 people found this useful


    Full Talkback thread

    0 comments


    Company/Topic Alerts

    Create a new alert from the list below:




    Video icon

    Video

    Microsoft Windows 7 Special Report Special Report

    How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

    How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

    Comment Many businesses have given Vista a wide berth; Microsoft must focus on five areas to make sure Windows 7 doesn't suffer the same fate, argues TechRepublic's Jason Hiner

    More Special Reports

    Desktop Management Benchmarking

    Test Your Desktop Management Systems

    How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

    Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


    Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

    Help

    Become part of the ZDNet community.

    Newsletters