Advertisement
Promo

Office applications Toolkit

What's it all about, Larry?

Gary Flood ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 16 Dec 2003 14:05 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The major issue facing the enterprise business apps space moving into 2004 has to be the state of play re Oracle's attempted acquisition of rival PeopleSoft.

This has less to do with any of the antler-clashing going on between the protagonists as with the implications for the software landscape in general. If colourful Oracle CEO Larry Ellison is right, his swoop on PeopleSoft is not as much to do with the specific changes in the apps market as it is a bellwether for wider and more troubling shifts in the wider industry.

That's because Ellison's argument -- in public -- is that Silicon Valley is dead. "The idea that Silicon Valley is going to come back and be anything like it was in the past with hundreds and thousands of start-ups, the Silicon Valley of old where people talk about deal flow and venture capital, a new company every day -- that's over, and that's a good thing," he told BusinessWeek in August.

IT doesn't matter
By which he means that the IT industry has matured to the point where fewer and fewer large players will inevitably and calmly preside over a less frantic supplier universe. Ellison's bid for PeopleSoft, in this light, is part of a wider Zeitgeist, a march to the drum of history. Significantly or not, Oracle's move came a month after the Harvard Business Review's pessimistic May article, "IT Doesn't Matter", which said users should cut IT investment and work with fewer suppliers.

Could be. What we do know is that this has all turned very nasty indeed. As it stands, Oracle's June hostile takeover bid (the value of which has since been raised to $7.3bn) has been rejected by the current PeopleSoft board. PeopleSoft's global director of corporate public relations, Steve Swasey, is adamant his company regards the bid as dead, given if nothing else that his company's stock is now trading in the low $20s and Oracle hasn't revised its $19.50 revised bid.

Next

Previous

1 2 3


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
188 out of 369 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Video icon

Video

Discussions

CA CA

yup..

Friday 18 December 2009, 12:16 AM

7 comments
1000278057 1000278057

We hear the spin...

Thursday 17 December 2009, 11:18 PM

1 comment
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Copyright in a new light

Thursday 17 December 2009, 8:42 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

POORLY PRIZES

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:48 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Tinsel on the TARDIS

There were shepherds on the hill, and the Doctor popped his head out of the TARDIS and said "you might want to see this" and they were astounded. WHY do we pay for a TV license?... More

Post a comment

Can I have fries with that? (Consumer...

Licence policies of Tech company's have been for a long time both complicated and 'Dick Turpin-esque', people just click 'I agree' without reading the Agreement. I do the same, but... More

1 comment

This Crap Site

How utterly stupid - I am ranked #40 in the top 100 - as a member of this site..... I mean HOW utterly stupid.... I have done sweet FA, I have only rejoined this site after a 3 or... More

2 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters