ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

Gates: Seamless computing is the aim

Jai Singh CNET News.com

Published: 20 Nov 2003 12:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

For two decades, Bill Gates has used his Comdex keynote speech to mark out his vision for technologies from the Internet to XML. This year he used the bully pulpit to make it clear that the industry is at one of its perennial crossroads.

Once considered simple nuisances attending the digital lifestyle, cyberattacks and spam have morphed into disruptions costing millions of dollars in downtime and wasted manpower. Against a backdrop of mounting customer frustration with insecure digital infrastructures, Gates laid out his vision for a new era of technology that removes much of the hassle of being a computer user.

CNET News.com caught up with the Microsoft co-founder and chairman earlier this week to talk about the lead-up to his "seamless computing" speech.

Q: You've been talking about seamless computing at this Comdex. Give us an overview of what's on your mind.
A: The key reason I picked the theme of seamless computing was to talk about the frontiers we still need to solve in the next few years. I see the things holding us back as being boundaries between different software systems...Why isn't e-commerce a reality? Why isn't managing your schedule digitally with friends and colleagues not a trivial thing to do? We can look and say that many of the problems are software challenges. Certainly, the solution to lowering operational costs on systems, the solutions to spam, the security challenges, the need to think of all these devices and how they work together -- that's largely a software problem.

How can you hope to break down the seams if the vendors still don't really cooperate? Isn't that still a challenge?
Well, yeah. Take for example getting Microsoft Office and SAP to really work super well together. There's a Web services architecture that allows us to schematise these things. There's a pure architectural theme. In 2000, we committed ourselves to the .Net strategy. That assumed XML and Web services would become mainstream. Looking back, one of the things that was a clear success was the bet on XML (Extensible Markup Language) and Web services. People are just beginning to understand how profound they are as industry standards.

At the semantic level, we actually now have standards. That's been a holy grail for over 20 years. People spent a lot of time futzing around getting the bits to flow between machines and now that we have that, you think, "Well I can point a browser at any Web site. Why can't I do a query about all the sellers?" The reason you can't is because that's at a higher semantic level than just how to put the stuff on the screen. And it's far more complex. Only Web services give us a foundation for us to do that, so in a sense, a lot of the dreams of the '90s, like true e-commerce, had to wait for this industry standard infrastructure and the tools to be put in place.

Next

Previous

1 2 3


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
105 out of 200 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Related Jobs

Experienced Clinical Research Associate Career Growth Exceptional!

A Company always pushing for independent innovation. The role will involve regular interaction with International management and external committees ...

Business Solutions Manager

To innovate healthcare, Roche has ambitious plans to keep learning and growing and is seeking people who have the same goals for themselves. ...

Contract Analyst - Warrington-00054434

Key Responsibilities Responsible for the management and delivery of complex and medium risk contracts and provide support to the business or client ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

319762 319762

Eve of Distraction

Saturday 26 July 2008, 4:37 AM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

8 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment