ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Application development Toolkit

Microsoft: .Net alive and well

David Becker CNET News.com

Published: 20 Nov 2003 10:30 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Microsoft's elusive .Net strategy -- a hot topic a few years ago but overshadowed by other Microsoft efforts lately -- was declared alive and well during a panel at the Comdex trade show.

While .Net was initially understood as a strategy for delivering software functionality as a Web-based service, it actually represents several major changes in direction for Microsoft, said John Montgomery, a group product manager for the software giant.

"I think Microsoft did a poor job when we introduced this and just stuck the .Net name on different products," Montgomery said.

"We've really done two things at once with this term .Net," he said, saying the term refers to a new model for working with Windows developers and a commitment to working with open standards to ensure interoperability between disparate computing systems. "Fundamentally, we're focused on making Windows a better place to build and deploy applications," he said.

Comdex panelists mostly focused on the interoperability aspect of .Net, giving Microsoft mixed grades for getting the standards gospel. Laura DiDio, an analyst for research firm Yankee Group, said the software maker has a genuine zeal for standards such as extensible markup language (XML).

"Since Bill Gates went back to being the chief scientist...Microsoft is very focused on a coherent message," she said. "That is XML everywhere and being much more open in terms of schemas and API's (application programming interfaces). It's real, it's happening, and Microsoft is making great strides."

Greg Stein, chairman of the Apache Software Foundation, the group behind the open-source Web server software, gave Microsoft respectable marks for standards compliance but questioned the immediate effect. ".Net allows you to interoperate with a bunch of things, and that means it's not going to be a great driving force," he said. "I see .Net really as still just a branding exercise."

Stein added that while building software to open standards is good, the open-source development model is a bigger issue for Microsoft. "Open-source really drives the monetisation of software," he said. "People are building more and more on top of these free technologies. People who try to sell frameworks are going to have a hard time doing that."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
39 out of 87 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

OO Developer. Stock Exchange. London. C++/Java

Projects include development of the market system and links to the trading system while supporting proprietary API and FIX protocol interfaces from ...

Security Cleared Oracle 10g Production DBA

Key skills for this role include: - Oracle Production DBA experience - Oracle 10g exposure - Experience in mission critical situations This is a ...

Team Manager for Pre / Post Sales Support Services West London

Rackspace is recognized time and again for excellence in service and innovation, these awards and recognition clearly demonstrate Rackspace's ...

Discussions

Macbrewer Macbrewer

Not really a security problem

Friday 16 May 2008, 4:17 PM

1 comment
harpless harpless

interesting..

Friday 16 May 2008, 4:06 PM

3 comments
harpless harpless

The game's up for Vista

Friday 16 May 2008, 3:48 PM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

The fact is: Software developers today are really designers and not coders. The reason that business anlaysts exist today to model solutions is because they understand the value of designing software before writing it. All too often developers create code that has little value because they do not understand that business classes interact with other classes within the confines of a working model or pattern.

By: 1000165269

Read full story:
Making sense of agile modelling