ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

Firm aims to simplify internal security

Munir Kotadia ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 31 Oct 2003 17:00 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

SSH Communications launched a security middleware platform on Friday that will bolster internal security by providing secure pathways between enterprise applications, servers and users.

SSH Tectia is unlike traditional SSL-based solutions because it does not require any additional hardware, changes to the corporate IP infrastructure or application development -- legacy or not. The company said this will save money that would otherwise be spent on training and development.

SSH's director of global marketing, Janne Saarikko, told ZDNet UK that traditionally, enterprises secure the perimeter of their network but do not bother protecting the traffic inside their firewall. This, he explained, is because it would be very expensive and time-consuming. "If a company has a department with 500 people using a legacy application and you add security features so that the interface changes, all the users will require training, which costs a lot of money," he said.

Saarikko said that SSH Tectia is a layer that lies between business applications and the IT infrastructure. It takes traffic from an application and puts it into a secure, encrypted tunnel and delivers it wherever it needs to go.

He admits this may sound like an IPSEC or SSL VPN solution, but is adamant that it is completely different. "There are technologies that tell a similar story, but our solution is unique. IPSEC is not used for internal security and SSL-based solutions typically require some hardware in front of each server," he said, pointing out that adding hardware to 900 servers is also going to be costly.

Additionally, he said that adding SSL to applications would not only require changes to the application, but also to the company's IP infrastructure.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
40 out of 74 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

Jim Mader Jim Mader

Hotmail

Friday 29 August 2008, 12:28 AM

4 comments
da9938k da9938k

same thing happened to me!!

Thursday 28 August 2008, 11:20 PM

3 comments
da9938k da9938k

same thing happened to me!!

Thursday 28 August 2008, 11:20 PM

3 comments

Vista Upgrade Blog

Official MS Windows 7 Bloggers

Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More

5 comments

Microsoft's Mojave just a desert vista

It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More

6 comments

... But Still a Few Things Amiss (with...

It's not all roses with Vista, of course. I had my first BSOD over the weekend, when I was turning the laptop back on after suspending it. They typical long blurb about "If this is... More

6 comments