ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

'The saga is over' - PeopleSoft chief

Alorie Gilbert CNET News.com

Published: 28 Aug 2003 08:35 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Oracle may be pressing on with a nearly three-month-old unfriendly quest to buy PeopleSoft, but to PeopleSoft chief executive Craig Conway, Oracle's bid is all but dead.

"I truly believe -- and I'm not being a peacock and spreading my feathers -- that the Oracle saga is over."

In an interview with CNET News.com on Wednesday, Conway said Oracle's $7.25bn (£4.61bn) tender offer for his company is no longer much of a concern to him. "I don't spend any time on it anymore," he said.

Initially, however, Oracle's "shock and awe campaign" to acquire PeopleSoft, launched on 6 June, had consumed the company, he said. Conway and his team rejected Oracle's offers and shifted into overdrive, filing a lawsuit against Oracle, enacting an anti-takeover measure, spending weekends visiting customers and investors, and more. Conway says those moves have helped him gain the upper hand.

"You fast-forward to the end of July and all of August and look at our brand name awareness and at the adjectives used to describe the No. 2 competitor, and (Oracle's bid) is not wholly a bad thing," Conway said, claiming Oracle's brand has been damaged by the allegedly "predatory" acquisition bid.

"My life is pretty good right now," Conway said.

As far as Conway is concerned, Oracle lost steam in July, after PeopleSoft sealed its $1.8bn purchase of J.D Edwards. Oracle had initially wished to stop that deal, which PeopleSoft had announced just days before Oracle's own bid. Another critical blow to Oracle, Conway said, was the fact that PeopleSoft announced strong second-quarter financial results, boosting investor confidence in the company. "In my mind, it was over in July," he said.

In addition, the Department of Justice has extended its antitrust review of the Oracle deal, causing Oracle to extend the PeopleSoft tender-offer period three times since June. "You can extend the offer every 30 days until the end of time," said Conway, and it won't faze him.

Conway said the next nail in the coffin of the Oracle bid will come on 4 September, the day he and the rest of PeopleSoft management are scheduled to present their integration plan with J.D. Edwards to Wall Street. At that meeting in New York, PeopleSoft will discuss the financial merits of the merger, revenue and earnings guidance of the combined company, as well as the new product schedule and distribution model of the company, he said. "That's the point that people will walk out of that room and say, 'man these guys have got a great plan,'" Conway said.

That kind of sentiment is critical for PeopleSoft. If investors lose confidence in the plan and send PeopleSoft's stock down, Oracle's bid might start looking more attractive to them. Ellison is betting on just that scenario.

Despite Conway's claim that PeopleSoft has come out ahead on this one, the company is pressing ahead with its lawsuit against Oracle, which charges that its rival's bid was designed purely to disrupt its business. "When somebody tries to rob your bank, even if they don't succeed, I think you should still press charges," Conway.

PeopleSoft also disclosed this week that it has restarted a money-back guarantee programme for customers, a tool it used in June to help ensure it met sales expectations in the quarter ending 30 June. By starting that programme again, PeopleSoft has signaled that Oracle's bid continues to make customers wary.

Conway said PeopleSoft has prevailed in its struggle with Oracle so far because of his company's high regard for customers. "Larry Ellison's play was consolidation at the expense of customers," he said.

"There is not a lot I respect about consolidating an industry at the expense of customers," Conway added. "To me, it's trying to corner a market."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
36 out of 92 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

Telic Telic

MacLinux

Friday 10 October 2008, 10:34 PM

5 comments
1000215420 1000215420

Punishment & Deterrent

Friday 10 October 2008, 9:37 PM

4 comments
1000215420 1000215420

Punishment & Deterrent

Friday 10 October 2008, 9:36 PM

4 comments
1000215420 1000215420

Lack of Individual Responsibility

Friday 10 October 2008, 9:32 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Vista - Still Running and Stable After...

Six weeks ago, when I wrote Renewed Adventures with Vista, I wondered if Microsoft had finally managed to fix it sufficiently that I wouldn't be forced to give up on it after a few... More

Post a comment

Official MS Windows 7 Bloggers

Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More

5 comments

Microsoft's Mojave just a desert vista

It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More

6 comments