ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

Microsoft: Why IT still matters

Martin LaMonica CNET News.com

Published: 14 Jul 2003 11:18 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A recent article in the Harvard Business Review stirred unusual interest within the senior ranks of the computer industry by contending that the broad availability of information technology has dulled IT's effectiveness as a competitive weapon.

Since then the piece, "IT Doesn't Matter", has been endlessly dissected -- as much as for what it suggested as for what it reported. Indeed, if the central thesis of the article proves true, the implications for an IT industry struggling to recover from nearly three fallow years are grave.

Like most tech companies, Microsoft has more than an academic interest in how all this turns out. The company, which has sold billions of dollars of software over the years, would suffer the effects of yet another slowdown in customer buying.

Paul Flessner, senior vice president of Microsoft's server platform division, recently waded into the debate in an interview with ZDNet UK's sister site, CNET News.com. Yes, he allowed, IT providers do indeed have a lot to answer for in terms of unfulfilled promises. But Flessner roundly rejects the notion that businesses should hand over the keys to their core businesses systems because the technology is too complex. He argued that companies with an interest in driving services revenue (read: IBM) are behind the promotion of the idea that IT should be paid for like gas or lighting bills.

Instead of wide-scale outsourcing, Microsoft says companies need products that are easier to implement and administer. In that vein, the company is working on ways to simplify datacentre operations and more tightly integrate products -- two initiatives whose success or failure may well help decide how much IT ultimately matters in coming years.

Q: It seems like Microsoft is essentially defending the position of IT in businesses. Are you?
A: You bet. I was an IT professional for a number of years. The (Harvard Business Review) article just isn't clean enough. (It) actually makes some good points; there are certain parts of any value chain that are less critical to a business. If you're a distribution company, you want to outsource or out-service your payroll system. Microsoft outsources our payroll system. There are systems that are less mission-critical to your business than others, and if they are truly viewed as commodity, then sure, manage them cost-effectively.

Any problem with that view?
I have no problem with that. I encourage it. I think it's exactly the right thing to do. But to say that because everyone has the same technology, it's a commodity? The golf club example is real: I don't play golf like Tiger Woods. Not everyone has the same systems that Wal-Mart does. It's just silly to think that there's no competitive advantage to be made in IT. It's insanity in my mind.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
98 out of 187 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Contract Specialist - Newcastle-00051050

Will be required to work in a client facing environment, with senior management levels Responsible for educating the project team on contract terms ...

SAP Functional Solution Architect

Good understanding of process knowledge, industry standard business initiatives and leverage from existing experience or other SAP deployments within ...

SAP IS Oil Application Consultant (Downstream)

Specific SAP R/3 module : Applied SAP IS Oil : Applied Oil and Gas Downstream process knowledge : Applied Communication : Mastered English: Fluent ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

319762 319762

Eve of Distraction

Saturday 26 July 2008, 4:37 AM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

8 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment