ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Application development Toolkit

Apple in court over Unix trademark

Ian Fried, CNET CNET News.com

Published: 12 Jun 2003 08:29 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

As legal battles heat up over who owns the rights to the Unix operating system, another dispute has been quietly simmering over the rights to the Unix name itself.

Apple Computer is being sued by The Open Group, the San Francisco company that claims ownership of the Unix trademark, for using the term Unix in conjunction with its Mac OS X operating system without a licence. Apple has countersued, asking a judge to declare that the trademark is invalid, because the term Unix has become generic.

Though initiated nearly 18 months ago, the case has not yet gone to trial. According to a motion filed with the court on Tuesday, both companies want to have an exchange of factual documents completed by August, with a trial sought for February.

This legal battle, though separate from SCO's recent claim that Linux uses copyrighted Unix source code, adds further fire to the debate over the custody of Unix -- the 30 plus year-old OS originally developed by AT&T.

Despite SCO's acquisition from Novell of much of the intellectual property associated with Unix, the Unix name itself was transferred to The Open Group, which established a licensing program for the use of the name that includes software testing as well as a licensing fee, among other things. SCO and Novell are sparring over the extent of SCO's ownership of Unix, while SCO and IBM are embroiled in a trade-secrets lawsuit.

The Open Group, also known as X/Open, sued Apple in December 2001 alleging, among other things, that Apple had infringed on its trademark. The case, filed in US District Court in San Jose, California, has been winding its way through the courts, with the parties still in the discovery process. Months of mediation meetings ended without a settlement, according to The Open Group.

Since introducing Mac OS X in March 2001, Apple has consistently touted the Unix underpinnings as part of its marketing of the operating system. Apple's Web site, for example, has a page devoted to the Unix base of the OS, including a logolike GIF that shows a metal plate bearing the words "Unix Based".

"That's kind of the one that we are least fond of," said Open Group chief operating officer Steve Nunn, who notes that the group has had a similar Unix licence logo of its own for some time.

The Open Group wants Apple to have Mac OS X undergo testing to certify that it complies with its standards for software bearing the Unix name; it also wants Apple to pay a fee. The Open Group says the costs to license the name are reasonable, based on the size of the company and the rough number of copies of the software Apple sells. In any case, no company is required to pay more than $110,000 (£67,000), said Graham Bird, vice president of marketing for The Open Group.

"Apple would be at the top of that range because they ship a lot of units," Bird said. "It's not like we are talking about bankrupting the company."

Apple argues it should be free to use the term as it sees fit, noting that there are many flavours of Unix, including FreeBSD, and that one should not have to submit to The Open Group's testing to use the term.

"Apple does not use the term Unix as a trademark in connection with Apple's product," the company said in court papers seen by CNET News.com. "Apple accurately uses the generic term Unix merely to identify or describe an aspect or feature of Apple's Mac OS X operating system. This is consistent with past and current industry standards."


What will Apple come up with next? For full Mac OS coverage, see ZDNet UK's Mac News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
49 out of 105 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Unix Systems Admin 6 months x 2

Must be willing to stay in a long term contract. Various Flavours of Unix Red Hat IBM My client is a market leader looking for two contractors to ...

Senior C++ Software Engineer - Linux / Unix- Design Patterns - Reading

This is a 12 month fixed term role with a very reasonable salary of between 42,000 - 58,000. Any experience of Unix / Linux Systems level ...

Unix / Linux Redhat Systems Administrator- Market Leaders- London

If your looking to work for a award winning market leading organisation where you can build a long term career this is the role for you send a copy ...

Discussions

AdamW AdamW

Linux, Laptops and Dual Displays

Saturday 26 July 2008, 6:34 PM

2 comments
keithmv keithmv

Password Deadlock

Saturday 26 July 2008, 12:02 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

The fact is: Software developers today are really designers and not coders. The reason that business anlaysts exist today to model solutions is because they understand the value of designing software before writing it. All too often developers create code that has little value because they do not understand that business classes interact with other classes within the confines of a working model or pattern.

By: 1000165269

Read full story:
Making sense of agile modelling