ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

The return of Code Red

John McCormick

Published: 24 Mar 2003 11:23 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A slight variant of the Code Red worm has appeared and is wreaking havoc in systems around the world despite having no new feature that would defeat any properly patched system or virtually any antivirus software. The major change in this version is the removal of the year limitation, which means it will essentially be with us forever. The fact that Code Red II (the previous incarnation of the worm) had a date limitation and has stopped spreading apparently led some administrators and users to ignore the patches that have been available since mid-2001.

Details

The original Code Red (now known as Code Red I) was designed to produce a distributed denial of service attack on the whitehouse.gov Web site, but it had no real effect because the payload targeted a specific IP. Once the worm was seen in the wild, the government simply changed the IP addresses for that server.

On June 18, 2001, Microsoft published a patch for the buffer overflow vulnerability in IIS file ldq.dll, which opened servers to this attack. That patch can block Code Red I, Code Red II, and this latest variant, Code Red.F.

Code Red II, which was first seen on August 4, 2001, took advantage of the same buffer overflow vulnerability in unpatched older Microsoft IIS Web Server versions. The big difference between Code Red I and II was that the payload carried by Code Red II wasn't a denial of service attack. Code Red II actually took over the server, allowing remote access to the infected system.

Code Red.F is a slight variant of the Code Red II worm. Like Code Red II, Code Red.F appears to differentiate between computers using the Chinese language and all others, but the difference is only one of timing and the intensity of the attack. After Code Red.F installs itself and its payload on Chinese systems, it sleeps for two or four days before it activates. On all other systems, it activates immediately upon installation.

It's likely that this Code Red variant is spreading once again because administrators of some infected machines don't realise they have IIS installed and therefore don't have any patches or service packs applied.

This latest version of the worm is variously known as Code Red.v3, Code Red.C, Code Red III, W32.Bady.C, and Code Red.F. Symantec reports that the backdoor planted by Code Red.F, Trojan.VirtualRoot, exploits a Windows 2000 vulnerability. To clear this vulnerability, install the security patch found in MS00-052, Relative Shell Path Vulnerability.

F-Secure provides a detailed analysis of this new version of Code Red with specific attention to the removal of date restrictions that killed off the Code Red II version at the end of 2002.

Code Red history lesson

31/07/2001: "Help & How-To: Code Red "

07/08/2001: "Code Red II: A double whammy "

24/08/2001: "Code Red is here to stay "

07/05/2002: "Code Red remains a major threat "

13/03/2003: "Code Red variant causes little alarm "

Applicability

In addition to Microsoft IIS 4.0 and 5.0 installations, other systems that are used to create Web pages, including those with FrontPage, may have IIS installed, perhaps without the knowledge of the user or administrator.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
96 out of 171 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

wydeboi wydeboi

Microsoft makes me cry

Monday 13 October 2008, 3:36 AM

3 comments
roger andre roger andre

Unwittingly Working For Google.

Sunday 12 October 2008, 10:49 PM

6 comments
roger andre roger andre

Skype Spying Debacle

Sunday 12 October 2008, 6:43 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Vista - Still Running and Stable After...

Six weeks ago, when I wrote Renewed Adventures with Vista, I wondered if Microsoft had finally managed to fix it sufficiently that I wouldn't be forced to give up on it after a few... More

Post a comment

Official MS Windows 7 Bloggers

Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More

5 comments

Microsoft's Mojave just a desert vista

It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More

6 comments