ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Office applications Toolkit

Pros and cons of outsourcing email

Bob Watkins

Published: 13 Mar 2003 15:10 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It may seem that recommending that a client outsource its email system would be a great way to put yourself out of a job. After all, it's hard to earn billable hours supporting a company's email infrastructure if it doesn't have one. The trend toward outsourcing applications such as email will continue whether IT consultants like it or not. However, outsourced email does force us to work at a higher level by presenting the business case for or against various technologies and helping the client transition smoothly to whichever solution is chosen. Depending on the client's size and the complexity of its current email system, outsourcing can be an attractive choice. In addition, being the trusted advisor who helps save money and hassle will likely lead clients to seek your advice again on other projects.

In this article, I'll compare two leading email systems -- Microsoft Exchange and Oracle Collaboration Suite -- and show how they can each be outsourced instead of implemented in-house. The result: Your clients save money and can focus their personnel on core business functions. I'll also discuss some of the downsides of outsourcing, so you can give your clients the full picture.

Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange is number one or two in the messaging software space, depending on how you account for such things. IBM's Lotus Notes product leads Exchange in revenue, but Exchange currently has the lead in the number of seats installed. Microsoft doesn't offer Exchange Server hosting directly. It relies on its network of certified partners to provide this type of value-added service. It's the partner's job to integrate additional features such as pager gateways, voice mail, and virus checking using third-party solutions to offer a complete package to the customer.

One Microsoft Certified Partner, Intermedia.NET, has been hosting Exchange Server for over two and a half years. Primarily a Web hosting provider, Intermedia's fastest growing business segment is Exchange hosting, according to Alexander Yevelev, director of sales and marketing. Typical of hosting companies, Intermedia has multiple high-speed connections to the Internet so that if one fails, its customers' email will still be accessible. Its servers are monitored constantly.

Yevelev sees two trends among his customers. One is that smaller clients who were originally satisfied with basic POP3 mail are moving to more complex messaging products like Exchange to add functionality. For these customers, a hosted solution makes more sense than taking on the costs and staffing an advanced messaging infrastructure requires. A small company with five to 10 employees in separate locations can't afford a dedicated email administrator, he says. The other trend he sees is larger companies moving from in-house Exchange hosting to outsourcing. A financial services company, he says, might be willing to pay $1,500 to $2,000 per month for a company like Intermedia to handle its email, so it can focus on core business.

Oracle Collaboration Suite
Oracle's messaging solution, Oracle Collaboration Suite (OCS), debuted in July 2002. Its second release, announced at the San Francisco OracleWorld conference in November 2002, adds instant messaging, Web conferencing, and cobrowsing via a client application called iMeeting. OCS is based on Oracle's 9i Database and 9i Application Server products, and includes runtime licenses for them. The database is used as the storage for both messages and their attachments, while the application server acts as a portal to access this content.

Oracle offers two outsourcing choices: The suite can be hosted on Oracle hardware in one of its own data centers (the @Oracle option), where it is monitored and maintained by Oracle personnel. Or it can be hosted on a customer's server, either in-house or at a third-party colocation data center (the @Customer option). In this case, Oracle will administer the suite for a monthly fee per user.

Outsourcing questions
Outsourcing a critical infrastructure function like email is a scary prospect for IT managers. If you suggest it as an option, you'd better have answers to some important questions. This list should serve as a template when you're working with a client interested in pursuing outsourced email:

  • Where will the data be physically stored?
  • Is there adequate physical security in the building?
  • Will client applications have a secure means to log on to the email server?
  • Does the hosting service have data centers with redundant network connections, backup power sources, and engineers on site 24x7? What about the customer's own network infrastructure?
  • Are its routers protected by an uninterruptible power supply?
  • Does it have redundant network connections in case one fails?
  • Is the hosting company financially sound? If the hosting provider is having financial problems, it could fold and take its customers' data with it.
  • How steep is the learning curve? Will all employees have to learn a new way to do things, or can current client applications and work processes be used? For instance, Oracle provides an Outlook Connector as part of OCS, so that employees can continue to use Outlook for mail and calendaring. The Connector converts native MAPI protocol to the Internet standard IMAP4, which is more efficient for large networks; similarly, it converts Outlook's calendar functions to Calendar Access Protocol (CAP). Exchange hosting companies, of course, support both the regular Exchange client and Outlook Web Access (OWA) directly.

Outsourcing an application shifts the burden of uptime from the application server to the network accessing it. Another downside of outsourcing is that it can be very difficult to reverse course and bring messaging back in-house if outsourcing doesn't deliver the promised gains. The people who used to manage the email will have been reassigned or will have left, and the software formerly used will not have kept pace with the functionality employees have become accustomed to. Keep these pitfalls in mind before you make the recommendation to outsource the email function to your clients.


For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the
Enterpise newsletter.

Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our
Guided Tour.

Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
63 out of 124 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:











Related Jobs

Applications Outsourcing Business Development Manager, Millions!

To fill this role effectively, the following are required: - Applications Management or Applications Outsourcing Sales/Business Development ...

Project Manager

Evidence of 3 or more client-facing projects with a focus on end-to-end delivery * Proven track record of successful delivery of IT projects to time ...

TECHNICAL SUPPORT OPERATIVE TELFORD - SHROPSHIRE

To apply, please send your full CV and current salary details tthrough the 'apply' button to Mr Colin Lee, Group Personnel Manager, Entanet The ...

Featured Talkback

Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

harpless harpless

SAP goes big business

Friday 25 July 2008, 6:17 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Will Drizzle rain on Sun's MySql

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:30 PM

1 comment

Vista Upgrade Blog

Microsoft's pre-modern message puts a...

Over at ZDNet.com, Ed Bott reports a first sighting of Microsoft's eagerly awaited $300 million ad campaign. Already the cause of much speculation, the consensus is that this will be... More

8 comments

A $40 CONSUMER-class router has create...

Believe it or not I don't work in IT, haven't for 7 years. Yes I work with Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded and as a result I have to know a lot about the OS, the kernal, Win API calls... More

Post a comment

Sick Puppy Redo

I generally follow a dispassionate investigative process when trying to discern what happened when a project goes bad. Although its a low priority item, it gets done simply because... More

Post a comment