ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Office applications Toolkit

Hide XP implementation considerations

Ric Liang

Published: 18 Feb 2003 10:34 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Testing for application compatibility
Application compatibility testing is one of the biggest challenges; there are potentially hundreds of applications installed within any organisation that will require testing.

Automated tools, such as Microsoft's SMS or Novell's ZENworks, can be used to detect and report on all applications installed on client PCs and can be a great asset.

Remember that not all of the detected applications are necessarily "core" to the business; you'll need to assess the necessity to test each one. I estimate that most organisations will determine that they have 10 to 12 "core" applications within their environments that will require complete product testing with respect to the XP environment.

Work with clients to determine which applications are required to run under Windows XP; those that don't should be uninstalled. Once identified, these applications need to be certified as Windows XP-compatible, either from the software developer, Microsoft, or by internal testing. Some applications may have to be upgraded for Windows XP certification.

Microsoft's Application Compatibility Toolkit (ACT) is but one of a collection of tools and documents that enable both application developers and IT professionals to resolve application compatibility issues. Technical staff involved in the project should avail themselves of the tools available from Microsoft.

Determine hardware upgrades and replacements
Based on minimum system requirements (Pentium 600-MHz/256 MB RAM/2 GB free disk), you must do a comprehensive hardware inventory detailing which PCs meet these requirements.

Using this inventory, you can then determine how many PCs would require upgrading and or replacing. Both of these issues must be addressed before an overall project budget can be determined. Once the hardware upgrade/replacement quantity is determined, shop around for pricing. Then, factor delivery and prep into the project plan.

In addition to the PC upgrades, additional testing will need to be done on peripherals to ensure they'll continue to function under the Windows XP operating system; this includes PDAs, printers, scanners, and others. An excellent utility for investigating hardware compatibility is the Windows XP Upgrade Advisor.

Companion products
Applications that are associated with Microsoft Office must be upgraded in order to ensure full compatibility. Such applications include:

  • Visio
  • Project
  • Access
  • FrontPage
  • Publisher
  • PhotoDraw
  • MapPoint
  • Data Analyzer

It's a stretch to state that all companion products must be upgraded, but capitalising the cost of such upgrades into the overall project cost makes good sense.

Who's going to pay?
Finally, before any real integration and upgrading begins, it's a good move to make sure it's clear who's paying for what. Costs for upgrading applications to function properly under Windows XP must be considered. Determining who will pay can be a thorny issue for both IT and the business.

It's best to develop a general policy -- for instance, that upgrade costs will be shared among business units or be paid from IT budgets -- rather than dealing with each separate application upgrade separately.


For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the
Enterpise newsletter.

Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our
Guided Tour.

Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
30 out of 71 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
Why do so many (virtually all) software packages think that they are so important that they have to be started automatically every time the computer boots? What is the largest number of "speed access", "update check", "camera download" and whatever other background programs you have ever seen running? Of those, how many did you really need?

By: J.A. Watson

Read full story:
Annoying software: a rogues' gallery

Discussions

Fastvideoboy Fastvideoboy

How to Rip DVD to iPod, MP4, AVI, WMV

Saturday 11 October 2008, 9:33 AM

1 post
deepesh deepesh

Hi

Saturday 11 October 2008, 8:38 AM

2 comments
deepesh deepesh

Hi

Saturday 11 October 2008, 8:38 AM

2 comments

Vista Upgrade Blog

Vista - Still Running and Stable After...

Six weeks ago, when I wrote Renewed Adventures with Vista, I wondered if Microsoft had finally managed to fix it sufficiently that I wouldn't be forced to give up on it after a few... More

Post a comment

Official MS Windows 7 Bloggers

Check this out: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7...spx Its an official blog "Engineering Windows 7" Nothing. That's what is revealed. Until there is real... More

5 comments

Microsoft's Mojave just a desert vista

It didn't seem fair to wade into Microsoft's “Mojave Experiment” advert quite so soon after the flat earth incident. But The Economist has no such qualms: in this week's issue, it wonders... More

6 comments