How does UnitedLinux stack up against Red Hat?
Scott Lowe
Published: 14 Jan 2003 15:58 GMT
How does it compare? Because of its market and mind share, Red Hat is the leading competitor to the UnitedLinux effort, especially in the U.S. market. Red Hat was invited to take part in the UnitedLinux effort, but politely declined for a very good reason: Red Hat has an excellent, well-supported solution already in place: the Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 2.1.
Since the release of UnitedLinux 1.0, SuSE and SCO were the first of the partners to release their own UnitedLinux-based offerings, called SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) 8 and the SCO Linux 4.0 Server, respectively. The UnitedLinux/SuSE/SCO offerings come with the 2.4.19 version of the Linux kernel, while Red Hat's currently includes 2.4.9. Significant enhancements, many related to security, have been made in the kernel releases between .9 and .19.
In the area of pricing, each vendor has its own model. SLES 8 costs $749 for a single-server license; Red Hat Linux Advanced Server Base is available for $799; and the SCO Linux 4.0 Server Base offering can be purchased for $599 but includes no bundled support.
Maintenance and support costs vary widely depending on the vendor and specific software edition that is purchased. For example, while SLES costs $749 for the software, adding a technical support contract can cost up to $2,200 per server per year. All editions include software maintenance for a period of time to deal with bug fixes and updates.
The verdict
From a purely technical standpoint, developers will likely have an easier time working with the partners in the UnitedLinux effort if they are interested in supporting a large number of distributions. All four vendors will be making use of the same core interfaces, components, and kernels, which will make development for these distributions much easier than for others that differ slightly here and there. It is doubtful, however, that UnitedLinux poses a major threat to the dominance that Red Hat currently has in the Linux market.
Worldwide, Red Hat is a major player, and especially so in the United States, where the words "Red Hat" are almost synonymous with the word "Linux." Red Hat benefits from a market share that is larger than that of all four UnitedLinux participants combined. In fact, many hardware vendors, including HP and IBM, have stated that even though they will support the UnitedLinux effort, they won't be leaving Red Hat behind.
That said, it is good to have a choice. This is one of the tenets of the Linux and open source communities. UnitedLinux may not have the market force to derail Red Hat, but this is definitely a significant step toward finding a balance between preventing the fragmentation of Linux, on the one hand, and allowing one company to dominate it, on the other. UnitedLinux will also ease development efforts and help provide more of a polished, corporate image for Linux, which will make it even more mainstream, rather than being viewed simply as an "alternative" solution.
For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the Enterpise newsletter.
Tell us what you think in the Enterprise Mailroom.
Previous
Did you find this article useful?
23 out of 85 people found this useful
Digg
Slashdot
Del.ici.ous
Stumble
Reddit
