ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Application development Toolkit

Perens takes on Internet standard body

Paul Festa CNET News.com CNET News.com

Published: 26 Nov 2002 11:28 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em -- in large numbers.

That's the logic behind free-software advocate Bruce Perens' idea to pack the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), a key Internet standard body, with like-minded members in advance of the group's spring meeting in San Francisco.

"The nice thing is that the IETF is an open-enrolment organisation," said Perens, a Linux developer who co-founded the Open Source Initiative, founded a group called Software in the Public Interest and helped develop the Debian version of Linux.

"The real business of the working group is carried out on a mailing list. We just need to get the free-software community better represented, which takes little more than my asking them to subscribe to this mailing list."

Perens' packing plan comes after the IETF's meeting last week in Atlanta, where among the working groups meeting face-to-face was the one recently constituted to revise and clarify the organisation's policy with respect to allowing royalty-encumbered technology in its standards.

The current IETF policy permits the use of such patented technology. But as the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and other standards groups reevaluate their intellectual property rights (IPR) policies, an effort has sprung up within the IETF to create a royalty-free policy.

Judging by an informal poll at the group's Atlanta meeting, that movement isn't gaining any momentum with the current membership, according to both Perens and the group's chair, Steve Bellovin.

"In fairness to people who showed up in Atlanta to discuss only this question (of the IPR policy), we polled the room," Bellovin wrote in an email interview. "Not only was there no consensus to request a recharter, there was a consensus against making such a request. In other words, if that balance continues, the IETF will not change its IPR policy."

Perens' idea to shift the balance by packing the organisation or the working group would be unprecedented, Bellovin said. And there was nothing in the IETF bylaws to prevent such a move.

It could, however, create a backlash against the arrivistes.

"To my knowledge, no one has ever tried to 'pack' a working group meeting," Bellovin said. "I suspect that anyone who did -- be it free-software advocates or large companies -- would be in for a lot of criticism. I think that large segments of the community, regardless of their opinions on IPR, would see this as an attempt to manipulate what has traditionally been one of the fairest, freest and most open standards groups on the planet."

Free-software makers and advocates have complained vociferously about the existence of patented technologies in industry standards because, by definition, free software is prevented from implementing them. Some patent defenders have sought to carve out exemptions in their licensing terms for free software, but corporations paying full price have objected to those exemptions.

Free-software advocates have until March to rally their troops to the IEFT front. The group holds its spring meeting in San Francisco from 16-23 March, at which time it will decide whether to recharter the existing group to weigh a switch to a royalty-free policy.

Perens insists that his drive to get more free-software advocates into the IETF is not a purely Machiavellian scheme.

"I don't want to be cynical about it," Perens said. "There's a lot of room for free-software folks to be working on IETF working groups -- not just the IPR committee. Thus, I'll be encouraging them to do so."

Perens credited the free-software community with having deluged the W3C with comments on the issue of intellectual property rights when it was first raised last year.


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
25 out of 40 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Software Engineer

They offer a full range of software tools intellectual property and design services for high- value programmable solutions. Working with a high ...

Senior Software Engineer

Accelrys combines experience and intellectual property developed during 25 years of serving research organisations with modeling and simulation, ...

Lead Technician- Windows (MCP, MCSE, MCSA)

Linux and Windows systems - Going above and beyond to solve any and all customer issues - Providing fanatical customer service at all times - ...

Discussions

AdamW AdamW

Linux, Laptops and Dual Displays

Saturday 26 July 2008, 6:34 PM

2 comments
keithmv keithmv

Password Deadlock

Saturday 26 July 2008, 12:02 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

The fact is: Software developers today are really designers and not coders. The reason that business anlaysts exist today to model solutions is because they understand the value of designing software before writing it. All too often developers create code that has little value because they do not understand that business classes interact with other classes within the confines of a working model or pattern.

By: 1000165269

Read full story:
Making sense of agile modelling