Advertisement
Promo

Enterprise applications Toolkit

Microsoft settlement watchers chosen

Joe Wilcox, CNET News.com CNet

Published: 22 Nov 2002 11:15 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Justice Department and Microsoft on Thursday picked two members of a three-person technical committee that will be responsible for enforcing the software giant's antitrust settlement.

In a motion filed with US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, the Justice Department and nine states -- Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin -- requested Harry Saal be appointed to the committee. Microsoft requested Franklin Fite's appointment to the oversight body.

In a four-page memorandum accompanying the request, the Justice Department made its case for why Kollar-Kotelly should appoint both men to the technical committee.

Saal "was founder and chief executive officer of Network General -- now Network Associates -- which was the first company dedicated to network diagnostics," the Justice Department memorandum stated. Saal, who holds a doctorate in physics from Columbia University, also has taught computer science courses.

Fite, who has a master's degree in computer science from Stanford University, is a former Microsoft employee. Fite was director of the Windows CE operating system from 1992 to 2000, according to the memorandum.

If Kollar-Kotelly approves the appointments, Fite and Saal would pick the third member of the committee.

Legal experts saw nothing overtly wrong with Microsoft choosing a former employee.

"It's not as unusual as you would think," said Rich Gray, an attorney closely watching the Microsoft case. "If you take arbitration panels as an example, it's quite common for each party to choose a member."

In fact, Gray said, the arbitration model in some ways makes sense given that enforcement would be of a settlement agreed to by parties sitting on opposite sides of the table.

"It's not unusual for parties to pick arbitrators that are favourable to their position," Gray said. "What Microsoft has done is not in my view objectionable."


Think it's all over? The antitrust case against Microsoft can still go back the to Court of Appeals, and then there's the European Commission's investigation... See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest headlines.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Microsoft forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
43 out of 70 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Microsoft Futures Special Report

Ozzie: Success of Azure comes down to trust

Ozzie: Success of Azure comes down to trust

News In an interview, Ray Ozzie says businesses will be taking a risk by placing core operations in Microsoft's datacentre, but that the software giant has more to lose if things go bad

More Special Reports


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters