ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Enterprise applications Toolkit

Microsoft settlement watchers chosen

Joe Wilcox, CNET News.com CNet

Published: 22 Nov 2002 11:15 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Justice Department and Microsoft on Thursday picked two members of a three-person technical committee that will be responsible for enforcing the software giant's antitrust settlement.

In a motion filed with US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, the Justice Department and nine states -- Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin -- requested Harry Saal be appointed to the committee. Microsoft requested Franklin Fite's appointment to the oversight body.

In a four-page memorandum accompanying the request, the Justice Department made its case for why Kollar-Kotelly should appoint both men to the technical committee.

Saal "was founder and chief executive officer of Network General -- now Network Associates -- which was the first company dedicated to network diagnostics," the Justice Department memorandum stated. Saal, who holds a doctorate in physics from Columbia University, also has taught computer science courses.

Fite, who has a master's degree in computer science from Stanford University, is a former Microsoft employee. Fite was director of the Windows CE operating system from 1992 to 2000, according to the memorandum.

If Kollar-Kotelly approves the appointments, Fite and Saal would pick the third member of the committee.

Legal experts saw nothing overtly wrong with Microsoft choosing a former employee.

"It's not as unusual as you would think," said Rich Gray, an attorney closely watching the Microsoft case. "If you take arbitration panels as an example, it's quite common for each party to choose a member."

In fact, Gray said, the arbitration model in some ways makes sense given that enforcement would be of a settlement agreed to by parties sitting on opposite sides of the table.

"It's not unusual for parties to pick arbitrators that are favourable to their position," Gray said. "What Microsoft has done is not in my view objectionable."


Think it's all over? The antitrust case against Microsoft can still go back the to Court of Appeals, and then there's the European Commission's investigation... See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest headlines.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Microsoft forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 68 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

SQL. Performance tuning. Strong Academics. Commodities IT. 40-55k

Canddiates must have demonstrative academics (a 2:1 in Computer Science from a leading university or equivalent), experience supporting or developing ...

Business Support Commodities ( VBA / Excel / SQL / UNIX ) London

Degree in Computer Science and a Post Degree in Capital Markets to join our team in London. We are currently looking for a Business Support ...

Junior Developer ( Java , SQL , Oracle , Sybase ) - London

Responsibilities - Design, develop and implement new features and modules in the Company's proprietary financial software system - Improve existing ...

Featured Talkback

The internet is going to have do a lot of maturing before it is ready for this kind of traffic. Security is always going to be a problem, connectivity is poor, and most business's are unwilling for their employees to have open access.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
Microsoft prepares to take Office online