ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

Microsoft and open source: Lessons learned?

Mary Jo Foley ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 01 Feb 2001 15:34 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Contrary to popular myth, Microsoft doesn't hate everything about open source.

While Microsoft officials publicly vacillate between declaring Linux either the most hyped operating system or the biggest threat to Windows, in reality, the company has learned some powerful lessons from its open source competitors.

In fact, during the past six months, Microsoft has made available to "hundreds" of its larger customers copies of its Windows source code, said Doug Miller, group product manager with Microsoft's Windows .Net server marketing group.

"Our goal is to make this [source code] available to many hundreds of customers," Miller said, during an interview at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo trade show in New York this week.

Source code is the set of underlying programming instructions that comprise an operating system. In general, open source refers to software such as the Linux operating system that is allows programs to be modified by users.

By contrast, Microsoft has retained tight control over the Windows source, which company executives have called Microsoft's "crown jewels".

Microsoft has licensed elements of the Windows source code to less than 100 software and hardware developers working closely with Microsoft on evolving the operating system, according to estimates by sources close to Microsoft. The company also has licensed the Windows source to universities and government bodies under restrictive terms that allow them to work with the code, but not make changes to it.

While Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer has suggested over the past two years that the company was interested in making the Windows source code more freely available, there was little evidence that Microsoft actually was interested in doing so.

"Microsoft is so security-conscious about letting the Windows source slip into anyone's hands" that a move to liberalise its source availability among customers is surprising, said Summit Strategies analyst Dwight Davis.

Davis said that during the remedy phase of the Department of Justice's antitrust trial against the software giant, Microsoft fought suggestions that it be required to share Windows source code with any kind of neutral third-party licensing body.

Microsoft is not going so far as to allow its customers to tamper with the Windows source, Miller emphasised. By contrast, software that is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence may be altered by developers, as long as they agree to publish any changes before publicly distributing the modified source code.

"We don't want to be in the situation that Linux is in, where there are more than 140 different distributions, leading to serious fragmentation," Miller said.

Nonetheless, Miller said Microsoft has become proactive in talking to customers about the plusses and minuses of open source software. He said Microsoft is constantly evaluating the packaging, pricing, channel programs, methods of distribution and other factors that lead customers to select one software product over another.

"Only a very small number of our customers want source code," Miller said, "but we've gotten a lot more aggressive in the past six months" about providing Microsoft's largest customers with source code, if they express an interest in having it.

Miller said that Microsoft's expectation is that customers who find a bug or another change they would like to see made in the source would contact Microsoft for tweaks.

Miller said that Microsoft and its customers have not found many other open source elements worthy of emulation. He said Microsoft believed its existing software development and testing paradigms served the company well. Miller added that Microsoft is moving to a subscription model, rather than to the open source business model of free software, supported by paid-for consulting services.

Take me to the Linux Lounge

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Linux lounge

Or perhaps you'd rather chat about Microsoft

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
33 out of 68 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

Test Consultant

Experience of testing engagements within a complex IT environment - Expert knowledge of formal testing processes and ability to rapidly diagnose ...

Client Valuations Business Analyst - Tier 1 Investment Bank! UpTo 80k

The role even has elements of ad-hoc project management for those looking for a career within this field The role offers a fantastic opportunity for ...

Tester Manager

Managed Test Service including customer satisfaction and budget - Develop the Test Strategy and Master Test Plan - Build and implement the Detailed ...

Featured Talkback

So if you upgrade to XP SP3 you can't uninstall Internet Explorer, I'm quite sure I'm having a Deja-vu feeling about MS preventing people from uninstalling Internet Explorer in other Windows products.

By: TheKLF99

Read full story:
Upgraders to XP SP3 warned over IE downgrades

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.