ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Desktop platforms Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;205413468;14699245;m?http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/2397-58840-22058-14

CeBIT 2000: Linux "better off" without Office

Richard Barry ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 25 Feb 2000 17:07 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Following speculation that Microsoft is intent to port its Office suite to Linux, the world's leading software company has flatly denied any involvement with the open source phenomenon.

Openly proclaiming its distaste for the very idea of working with or for Linux, a senior company representative told ZDNet that while there may be a minority of those interested in the OS, Microsoft wasn't one of them.

Responding to comments by LinuxCare executive vice president Arthur F Tyde at Thursday's CeBIT show in Hannover, Jeremy Gittins, senior product manager for desktop applications at Microsoft said: "I can tell you quite definitely that we have not got any plans to work with Linux, we've never had any plans like that." Asked if there was any chance of there ever being a port of Office for the Linux platform, recently cited by international analyst IDC as catching NT in the server space, Gittins was clear: "No. We will continue to develop for the best, most compelling operating system environment available. That is Windows 2000."

Quizzed on whether the software giant might feel that creating a Microsoft distribution of Linux could be a prudent move in the long term, Gittins seemed almost indignant. "What you have to ask yourself here is what the possible benefit would be. I really do believe that competition is great, but I just don't understand the proposition that they [LinuxCare] are making. What would the benefit be?"

One source, who requested anonymity, told ZDNet on Friday, "Well this is what you'd expect from the mighty M. What's laughable is the tone of Gittins' remarks. Does he know that his master admitted on TV less than a fortnight ago that Windows 2000 would cause problems for 25 percent of its users? Oh, and there's those 60,000 or so bugs it ships with, for free. That is Windows 2000. We're better off leaving Microsoft well alone."

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom and read what others have to say.

Take me to the NEW Windows special.

For full coverage, see ZDNet UK's CeBIT 2000 special.

Take me to the Linux Lounge.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
29 out of 63 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:












Related Jobs

AS400 Operator with NT experience - Middlesex / NW London

Good understanding of AS/400 required and some Windows NT/200 and LAN/WAN experience needed. iSeries. AS/400. A leading blue chip company is ...

Immediate NT Admin Role

As a 2nd and 3rd Line support function you will be responsible for the management of the NT/2000/2003/ESX based SCEE servers and networked systems ...

NT SYSTEMS ENGINEER - CITRIX PS4 - FINANCE - 50K

An NT Systems Engineer with extensive experience of administering Windows 2003 server, Active Directory, Exchange2003, Citrix PS4, MSClustering and ...

Featured Talkback

So if you upgrade to XP SP3 you can't uninstall Internet Explorer, I'm quite sure I'm having a Deja-vu feeling about MS preventing people from uninstalling Internet Explorer in other Windows products.

By: TheKLF99

Read full story:
Upgraders to XP SP3 warned over IE downgrades

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.