ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Symantec: Evolved Storm worm attack brewing

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 06 May 2008 15:22 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security vendor Symantec has warned that the Storm worm, the malware which contributes to the Storm botnet, is continuing to evolve and now has two further possible avenues of attack.

A number of nascent Storm hosting domains using fast-flux techniques to mask their URLs have been identified by the security company, which issued a warning on Monday. Fast-flux service networks are networks of compromised computer systems with public DNS records that are constantly changing, making it more difficult to track and control criminal activities.

The security vendor claimed that these domains so far do not directly attempt to upload attack code. However, modifying the URL runs a script which attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in various applications, including Microsoft Internet Explorer, RealNetworks RealPlayer, AOL and MySpace.

The two possible avenues of attack are spam with links to the as-yet-unlinked-to fast-flux sites or injecting malicious iFrame tags into legitimate websites, which would download malware onto users' machines, warned Symantec. However no such spam has been reported, the security specialist claimed.

"What's interesting about this is that we have yet to come across any spam that may result in people visiting these domains," wrote Symantec vulnerability researcher Vikram Thakur in a blog post. "This is very unusual. It is also interesting to note the move from simply using social-engineering techniques to spread malware to actually exploiting vulnerabilities. In the past, the Storm worm authors would directly link to malware on websites or within spam emails. The malware wouldn't check for any particular vulnerability before planting its seed."

Thakur noted that third-party applications rather than operating-system vulnerabilities were being targeted but that "only time will allow the method employed in this wave of attacks to be confirmed".

Some security vendors have reported that the influence of Storm is waning. Storm researcher Jon Stewart, director of malware research for security vendor SecureWorks, wrote on 8 April that the Storm botnet was "only a fraction of its former self and is rapidly becoming a minor player." However, Stewart noted that the botnet was still capable of sending over three billion spams per day.

The Storm worm botnet, a network of compromised computers, has been estimated to control between one million and five million machines, which one researcher said makes it more powerful than IBM's Blue Gene/L supercomputer. The original Storm worm code, which appeared on 19 January, 2007, derived its name from the fact that the first spam linking to the malware coincided with a severe winter storm in Europe.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
4 out of 7 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Security Consultant - Immediate start

The desired candidate will have the following skillset: * Network Vulnerability Internal & External Testing * Configuration of Cisco switches / ...

.NET Architect Contract - Stoke-on-Trent

NET Platform knowledge - Web architecture experience - Security procedures experience with large scale Websites and their vulnerabilities Please ...

Storage Consultant - Veritas Legato Commvault Enterprise Vault EMC x4

Storage Consultant - Senior Engineer Trainee Consultant - Backup / SAN - Veritas / Symantec Backup Exec, Netbackup, Legato Networker, Commvault ...

Sentry Posts Blog

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation