ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Tories attack gov't over cybercrime delay

Nick Heath silicon.com

Published: 04 Apr 2008 08:46 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Tories have launched a stinging attack on the government's failure to pay £1.3m to fund a national e-crime policing unit.

Shadow home secretary David Davis said a crime is committed online in the UK "every 10 seconds", costing UK businesses £10bn a year.

The unit would provide leadership and expertise to co-ordinate investigations nationwide and collate reports from police forces across the country, as well as offering a central point of contact for reporting e-crime.

Read this

Special report
Special report: Data breaches

How to protect your company from data-breach liability

Read more +

Speaking at a conference on law enforcement, organised by Microsoft, Davis contrasted this to the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) devoting less than two percent of its staff and one percent of its budget to fighting e-crime.

Davis criticised the Home Office's delay in providing the £1.3m start-up costs for the Policing Central E-crime Unit (PCEU), proposed by the Metropolitan Police Service and Association of Chief Police Officers.

He said: "The threat is rising… with eight out of 10 major businesses targeted by cybercriminals last year. And yet... the government can't even cobble together the £1m necessary to start up a national police e-crime unit to start dealing with this escalating problem."

Davis reiterated the Conservative Party's commitment to starting its own dedicated cybercrime policing and reporting unit if elected to government.

Credit: UK 'failing on cyber crime' from silicon.com

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
4 out of 4 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Team Leader / Senior Solutions Development Engineer- Cambrisge, Southeast

Job purpose: To be a leading member of a team that uses combinations of Kofax and third-party products to create solutions targeted at automating ...

Solutions Architect

For more information and to apply online, please visit our dedicated recruitment website www.hays.com/jobs/leicestershirecountycouncil The purpose of ...

Biostatistics Team Leader

Progressive Pharma is part of Progressive International, a leading pan-European recruitment specialist dedicated to contract and permanent ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation