ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Apple's Leopard lasts '30 seconds' in hack contest

Liam Tung ZDNet Australia

Published: 28 Mar 2008 09:22 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Apple's Leopard has been hacked within 30 seconds using a flaw in Safari, with rival operating systems Ubuntu and Windows Vista so far remaining impenetrable in the CanSecWest PWN to Own competition.

Security firm Independent Security Evaluators (ISE) — the same company that discovered the first iPhone bug last year — has successfully compromised a fully patched Apple MacBook Air at the CanSecWest competition, winning $10,000 (£5,000;) as a result.

Although the competition recorded the hack taking eight minutes, Charlie Miller, a principal analyst with ISE, told ZDNet.com.au that it took just 30 seconds and was achieved using a previously unknown flaw in Apple's Safari web browser.

"It might have taken eight minutes to sit down and open the computer but, when the competition started, 30 seconds later, it was over," said Miller.

Apple has been notified of the flaw, according to TippingPoint, the intrusion-detection company which provided the prize money.

Competitors in the hacking race were allowed to choose either a Sony laptop running Ubuntu 7.10, a Fujitsu laptop running Vista Ultimate SP1 or a MacBook Air running OS X 10.5.2.

"We could have chosen any of those three but had to make a judgement call on which would be the easiest and decided it would be Leopard," Miller said.

"Every time I look for [a flaw in Leopard] I find one. I can't say the same for Linux or Windows. I found the iPhone bug a year ago and that was a Safari bug as well. I've also found other bugs in QuickTime."

When the three operating systems were announced as competitors at the event a few weeks ago, ISE began looking for a bug and then spent time refining the attack to ensure it worked well on competition day.

The technique used to hack the MacBook Air was similar to a phishing attack where a victim is sent a link which they click on to visit a site containing malicious code, said Miller.

"Basically you type in something to the web browser and go to website that is controlled. In real life, you would get a link in an email and, if you clicked on it, that would be the same thing," he said.

But hacking Leopard was not meant as an attack on Apple, according to Miller: "I use a MacBook all the time and that's what I used in the contest to attack the MacBook Air. I like Macs. That's the reason I went for it; it's in my best interest for them to be as secure as possible."

Credit: Apple's Leopard hacked in 30 seconds from ZDNet Australia

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
37 out of 45 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

Citrix Principal Consultant 60-65k + Car, Laptop, Health, Training!

Would you like to work for an award winning company as a Citrix Principal Consultant? If so, read on! My client has an opportunity for a Citrix ...

Systems Administrators/ Linux/ Windows/ Unix/ Networking/ W.London

Systems Administrators/ Linux/ Windows/ Unix/ Networking/ 24/7/ W.London Do you want a new challenge ? Do you want a role to develop you existing ...

Application Support/Coding/Bug Fixing - North London to 30k SQL

Exciting new role for a Application Support Engineer with some Programming experience to join my leading client based in North London to work on ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation