ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

'Highly critical' flaws found in Safari for Windows

David Meyer ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 26 Mar 2008 13:11 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Two security flaws have been found in the Windows version of Apple's Safari browser, which was released just over a week ago.

An address-bar spoofing flaw was discovered by Argentinian researcher Juan Pablo Lopez Yacubian, who reported it to the Danish security company Secunia on Monday. He also reported a second vulnerability involving memory corruption, although Secunia has not yet established whether or not this flaw is exploitable. Even so, Secunia has classified the vulnerabilities as "highly critical".

"The one vulnerability is a classic spoofing vulnerability which will allow the attacker to make the Safari user believe he is on a different site than he actually is, which makes it easier to steal information from that user," Secunia's chief technology officer, Thomas Kristensen, told ZDNet.co.uk on Wednesday.

"As for the other one… we are still investigating that one," Kristensen added. "It is a memory-corruption vulnerability and we haven't proven yet that it can be exploited but, if it can, then it would be possible for a malicious site to execute keyloggers or other malicious code."

Kristensen said that Apple's controversial tactic of pushing out Safari for Windows as an opt-out "update" to existing iTunes users would be "getting [the browser] more users", but stressed that he "[did] not think the user base for Safari on Windows is big enough for anyone to want to exploit this right now".

"None of those [vulnerabilities] can be exploited if you don't actively use Safari to visit a malicious website," Kristensen said, while confirming that the security flaws have not yet been patched by Apple.

Apple had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
17 out of 20 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Related Jobs

*Clinical Researcher SE UK Generics Pharma Co 30-35K*

Job Summary: To provide my Client with high quality bioequivalence or clinical reports of a registerable quality. Requirements: 1. To review and ...

Computer Vision PhD Algorithm Researcher - Oxford

Senior Computer Vision Scientist wanted for an advanced imaging company. My client is looking for a 1st class postgraduate with a top academic career ...

Analyst Programmer - Classic Asp/.net/SQL

The successful candidate will have several years experience with Classic Asp, .net(vb.net,asp.net) and SQL server (including T-sql and stored ...

Sentry Posts Blog

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Indian officials accuse China of cyber...

China is actively engaged in mapping India's computer networks, according to the Times of India. China is mounting "almost daily" attacks against Indian Government computer systems,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation