ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

F-Secure warns of archive protocol danger

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 19 Mar 2008 14:07 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security vendor F-Secure has warned of multiple critical vulnerabilities in its own and other vendors' products.

The vulnerabilities exist in the way the products respond to malformed archive files, and were discovered by researchers at the University of Oulu in Finland.

"The Secure Programming Group at Oulu University has created a collection of malformed archive files," wrote F-Secure director of antivirus research, Mikko Hyppönen, in a blog post on Monday. "These archive files break and crash products from at least 40 vendors — including several antivirus vendors… including us."

F-Secure products affected include F-Secure Internet Security 2008, F-Secure Anti-Virus 2008, F-Secure Mobile Anti-Virus for Windows Mobile 2003/5.0/6, and F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux 4.65 and earlier versions, according to an F-Secure security bulletin. Successful exploitation of the vulnerabilities could result in remote code execution.

Other software affected includes Debian libarchive1, FreeBSD libarchive 3, Gentoo app-arch/libarchive and Suse libarchive, according to an advisory from the Finnish computer emergency response team, CERT-FI.

The University of Oulu researchers discovered the vulnerabilities in various archive file formats, including ZIP, as part of their Protos Genome Project. The project tested malformed archive protocols inputted into archive file formats. The research identified that "most implementations evaluated failed to perform in a robust manner", according to the CERT-FI advisory.

Patches are available for some of the affected F-Secure products via links in the F-Secure security bulletin, while patches for affected Linux products are available through links in the CERT-FI advisory.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
8 out of 8 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Network Security Technician - North London 20 25K+BONUS:

This IT Security Specialist - focuses on Intrusion Prevention, Anti Virus URL & Email Filtering Are you a person that can build upon this companies ...

Systems Administrator/Server2003/ AD/London/ Exchange/TCP/IP/ DNS/DHCP

Systems Administrator/ MCSE/ Server2003/ Active Directory/ SW/London/ Exchange/Anti Virus/ Backups/ IIS/ XP Office/ BES/ TCP/IP/ DNS/ DHCP Worlds ...

3rd Line Engineer- CIVIL SERVICE CO. Central London (32,000k)

Support Analyst with excellent experience in Windows 2003 Server/XP & McAfee Anti Virus required! Windows, ITIL experience required! I have a ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation