ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Businesses may be forced to fund e-crime unit

Nick Heath silicon.com

Published: 18 Mar 2008 08:24 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Businesses would be forced to contribute to the funding of a national police e-crime unit under the current proposal being considered by the Home Office.

But the private sector has hit back, saying the core funding for a dedicated police unit to combat e-crime must come from the government.

It follows a suggestion that the Policing Central E-crime Unit, proposed by the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and the Metropolitan Police Service, would be jointly funded by the Home Office, Acpo and businesses.

Jeremy Beale, head of e-business at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), said: "As regards funding, e-crime is a problem for everyone and often impacts more than one party. Businesses would probably be prepared to pay for services of particular sectoral interest to them. But in general it should be funded out of general taxation."

Catherine Bowen, head of crime policy at the British Retail Consortium (BRC), said businesses would expect to have input on the running of the unit if they were supporting its costs.

She said: "We would expect there to be consultation with our members to ensure their concerns were being properly addressed by the unit."

Read this

Feature
Feature: Cracking open the cybercrime economy

Hacking for fun has evolved into hacking for profit, and created a business model that is nearly as sophisticated as that of legal software

Read more +

Influence of big business over the unit concerned the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), with a spokeswoman saying larger companies may be rewarded with more say over its running in return for bigger contributions.

She said: "We need to get away from seeing cybercrime as being synonymous with big business — it affects small businesses just as much. SMEs funding an e-crime unit is not feasible. In short — normal policing is paid for out of the public purse, therefore e-crime too."

Ollie Ross, director of research at blue chip UK Plc IT user group the Corporate IT Forum (Tif), said: "A centralised e-crime unit has to be funded on a sound, secure and long-term basis — any such organisation cannot be impacted by market fluctuations. We have to ensure the next e-crime unit is placed on a firm footing from the start."

A spokesman for Intellect said it is a complicated situation: "There are a lot of stakeholders who have an interest in tackling e-crime, you have the consumers, the retailers, the Financial Services Authority, the government and police.

"There would need to be some very careful consultation over how it would be supported to ensure that it remained independent and representative of these stakeholders."

Credit: Businesses may be forced to pay for e-crime police from silicon.com

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
6 out of 6 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

2 comments

  1. Who pays??? 1000215420
  2. e-crime tax? harpless

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Project manager, Bank, Amsterdam, 9 month contract, URGENT!

A good understanding of managing payments, group funding and liquidity is required. Manage project COPAFITH/ front to back Liaise with Front Office, ...

Development Manager- London- 40-45k + Benefits

Comprehensive internal learning and development programmes A funded professional qualification scheme. Building partnerships with local ...

Security Consultant - Long Term Contract

Identifying solutions (technical and/or non-technical) to address security requirements, in consultation with project team members, accreditors, data ...

Sentry Posts Blog

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation