Advertisement
Promo

Security management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;214682528;14505427;f?http://uk.blackberry.com/ataglance/security/

Lost HMRC data 'worth £1.5bn to criminals'

Andy McCue silicon.com

Published: 29 Nov 2007 15:52 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The two lost HM Revenue & Customs CDs containing the personal and financial details of 25 million people could be worth £1.5bn to criminals.

Liberal Democrat acting leader Vince Cable, speaking in the House of Commons, said a single stolen identity is worth £60 on the black market.

He said: "We are therefore considering a stock of criminal value of around £1.5bn, which makes the Brinks Mat robbery the equivalent of stealing the church collection. An enormous amount remains at stake."

But chancellor of the exchequer Alistair Darling said: "The police inform me that they still have no evidence or intelligence that this data has fallen into the wrong hands and no evidence of fraud or criminal activity."

Encryption is simply not happening. What are the reasons for that?

Vince Cable

Cable also slammed the failure to use encryption technology to secure the data on the lost CDs and said most data being shipped around in government is not being encrypted.

He said: "Encryption is simply not happening. What are the reasons for that? My understanding, from talking to some of the specialists involved, is that IT specialists, mostly freelancers, are needed to encrypt data. The big IT companies are not interested in using them and the civil servants who oversee them do not understand the problem, so encryption is not happening."

Darling faced another grilling from MPs and was accused by shadow chancellor George Osborne of not telling the public the "whole truth" about the loss of the two CDs in Darling's original statement last week.

But Darling responded: "That statement was accurate in every respect in accordance with the information that I had then and have today. I specifically said in my statement that the House would understand that because the investigation was continuing, I was not yet in a position to give a full account of what had happened."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
6 out of 6 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Motorola Droid Drops Today: Happy Droi...

Motorola Droid Drops Today: Happy Droid Day America! Author: Eric Everson, Mobile Security Expert If you’re wondering what all of the buzz is about with words like Droid and Android... More

Post a comment

Mobile Security Profile: BlackBerry St...

Mobile Security Profile: BlackBerry Storm2 Author: Eric Everson BlackBerry handsets are a staple of office culture; from syncing calendars to sharing business-related data,... More

Post a comment

South Korea plans to fingerprint visit...

The South Korean authorities could fingerprint and photograph foreign visitors from 2012, the Korea Times reported on Tuesday. Barring diplomats and government operatives, all visitors... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
It seems to me this is a burden being placed on the wrong shoulders. There is not an It system in the world that can stop an individual taking information in their heads and spewing out at the nearest undesirable third party.

By: RonaldWilkins

Read full story:
Deloitte: People are still weakest security link


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters