ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Modern PCs to challenge WWII codebreaker

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 15 Nov 2007 15:09 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Colossus, the cipher-breaking World War II computer, is to be pitted against modern computing power in a competition organised by the National Museum of Computing.

In an event called the "Cipher Challenge", which is running on Thursday and Friday, the Colossus has to decode radio communications intercepted from Germany. Competing against it and a team from the National Museum of Computing will be radio enthusiasts who will intercept the messages and race against the rebuilt Colossus to decrypt them, using whatever computing means they have at their disposal.

Anthony Sale, who heads up the team which rebuilt the Colossus, said that text in German had been encrypted using a Lorenz teleprinter cipher machine, the same machine which was used by Germany for high-level communications in WWII. "We've enciphered signals on the Lorenz, and a team is transmitting from Paderborn [in Germany]. The signals are being intercepted by stacks of people, and the challenge is to break the cipher before Colossus does."

The Colossus works by comparing two data streams, added Cliff Horrocks, another member of the team that rebuilt the computer. Cipher text on a paper tape is loaded onto the computer and the data is compared with an electronic simulation of the Lorenz machine at different wheel settings. Lorenz machines use differing combinations of wheels to set ciphers. Like the famous Enigma cipher machine, the Lorenz creates the random numbers needed to build a robust cipher.

Once the Lorenz settings are known, the cipher stream is then passed through a machine called "Tunny", which uses the same wheel patterns as the Lorenz machine to decode the message and render it in plaintext. A Tunny machine is currently being rebuilt, so the Colossus team will use a simulated Tunny machine to decipher the message.

"We're comparing the intercepted cipher text [with a simulated] Lorenz machine, to work out the cipher stream," said Horrocks. "We're looking for adjacent German characters using Boolean maths. At every pass of the tape the program is stepped round one character. When we reach a threshold for a match count, we can say with certainty that it is a [Lorenz] setting for a particular run, and the setting is printed."

Colossus computers were built during WWII at British codebreaking centre Bletchley Park, where the National Museum of Computing is now housed. Billed as the first electronic computers, 10 Colossi were eventually built. Sale and his team have spent 14 years rebuilding a Mark II Colossus, which is now installed at Bletchley Park.

"It took 14 years to rebuild, just because of lack of information," said Sale. "All the drawings [of Colossi] were burnt in 1960, so all we had to go on were six black-and-white photos and 10 fragments of circuit diagrams. The machine has 2,500 valves, so it was a challenge piecing it all together."

While the Colossus project remained completely secret during the war and for a period afterwards, the people who contributed to it went on to use their knowledge to design computer systems. Alan Turing moved on to design the Automatic Computing Engine (ACE) in 1945, while Max Newman developed the Manchester Mark 1 computer at Manchester University, the first stored program computer. Tommy Flowers, who had designed and built the first Colossus while working for the Post Office, went back to designing and building Post Office telephone exchange systems.

Colossus
 
The National Museum of Computing's Cipher Challenge will see a rebuilt Mark II Colossus pitted against modern PCs in a codebreaking race
 
 

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
18 out of 18 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

SAP Retail Solutions Project Manager / Integration Architect

The successful candidates will be able to Scope, shape and deliver Retail solutions to clients against defined client value propositions in both ...

SAP IS Oil Application Consultant (Downstream)

Would have the capability to lead a team and to take accountability for the design and delivery of an entire work stream e.g. All qualified ...

J2EE / Java Developer - J2EE, Java - Greater London

Role: J2EE / Java Developer - J2EE, Java - Greater London Location: Watford, Herts, - South East UK, Greater London Salary: Competitive Type: ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation