ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Security threats Toolkit

Catching up with a famous fraudster

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 01 Nov 2007 12:37 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

...access to buildings and computers, but do you trust Visa with your DNA? I wouldn't. Once you lose your DNA you've lost your identity forever. As long as information is stored somewhere there's going to be breaches.

The UK government seems to claim that the National Identity Register won't be breached. Are you in favour of identity cards?
I'm not big on ID cards — you're giving the government information that someone else can access. ID cards make it 100 times easier to steal that information, because it's concentrated in one place.

That the ID Cards scheme was passed into law was not a good idea. Nothing is really secure; if the money is right, you can forge a passport to back fraudulent activities — you can forge ID cards. You can replicate holograms, dyes in paper, and give terrorists access to Britain.

With the ID cards scheme, all it takes is one weak civil servant to be bought off, and one weak link can [compromise the system].

Sentry Posts Blog

Sentry Posts Blog
Guarding the network

What you need to know — and what you and your peers have to tell us — about security management in our new community group blog

Read more +

So how concerned should businesses be about their employees?
Businesses should be very concerned about their employees. Most don't do background checks, because an employee started out as a receptionist. But now, guess what? They're an accounts executive, with access to [sensitive] information.

Companies should do background checks before they employ someone, and continue to do background checks, every 90 days.

But wouldn't that infringe on someone's privacy?
Basically the employee would grant permission to do background checks, as a condition of employment. It's a right of the company to do background checks on employees, to make sure information stays within the company. You can't just keep hiring people, because one weak link breaks the chain.

What's your opinion on a data-breach notification law for the UK?
In the US, every time there's a breach, you get a letter. Absolutely I'm in favour of data-breach laws — if someone gets into a company's systems, or there's a breach, by law companies have to send their customers notification within 24 hours. It lets the person take action themselves.

People have a right to know if their information has been breached.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
25 out of 25 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Sentry Posts Blog

Nasa and the virus

Yesterday the BBC ran a story about a computer virus making it into orbit, which I read with incredulity. OK, it's a nice silly season story on the surface, but what really got me was... More

3 comments

Customer data found on eBay server hig...

The recent news about customer details being retrieved from a server sold on eBay is yet another story about the sorry state of information security in the electronic age (see: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/...m).... More

Post a comment

Does it matter if you are an aardvark...

In spam terms, apparently it does. According to Cambridge University security expert Richard Clayton, if your email address is aardvark at animal.net, you are more likely to receive... More

5 comments