Published: 30 Oct 2007 16:40 GMT
Art Coviello, RSA's president, warns of the consequences of making vendors liable for the security of their products, calling instead for self regulation, and discusses whether encryption is always right for businesses, as well as the need for a data-breach notification law.
Did you find this article useful?
Create a new alert from the list below:
We have developed an email encryption solution for the PC using C++, wxWidgets and URGENT ROLE We are looking for an extremely competent Mac ...
A financial organisation in the West Midlands are looking to recruit a compliance analyst to provide technical and compliance analytical services to ...
My client designs & builds a network security encryption product that is predominately used by the government. Technical Network Consultant / ...
Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More
We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More
On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.
By: ator1940
Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation
Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links
