ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Gmail cookie vulnerability exposes user's privacy

Liam Tung ZDNet Australia

Published: 27 Sep 2007 08:12 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Petko Petkov of ethical hacking group GNUCitizen has developed a proof-of-concept program to steal contacts and incoming emails from Google Gmail users.

"This can be used to forward all your incoming email," Pure Hacking security researcher Chris Gatford said. "It's just a proof of concept at the moment but what they're demonstrating is the potential to use this vulnerability for malicious purposes."

According to Gatford, attackers could compromise a Gmail account — using a cross-site scripting [XSS] vulnerability — if the victim is logged in and clicks on a malicious link. From that moment, the attacker can take over the session cookies for Gmail and subsequently forward all the account's messages to a POP account.

"If someone picks up on this before Google fixes it — or if someone knew of the vulnerability before this guy published it — this could be very damaging to Gmail users," he added.

The problem is potentially compounded by Google's policy of retaining cookies for two years.

"Once you've managed to snarf a cookie you can access [a user's] Gmail account without the password for the next two years," he said.

While the obvious risk is to the home user, many organisations could be exposed since they do not filter employee emails sent from work to personal accounts, he added.

IBRS security analyst James Turner told ZDNet Australia: "People do use private accounts to store work information. I've worked at one organisation where this was implicitly expected, because the mail server at the time was so unreliable. But that scenario is certainly less than optimal.

"In an ideal world, an organisation would be able to draw a line in the sand and say that corporate data does not pass this point. The current reality is that there are Gen-Y workers who are sharing information with each other on multiple alternative communication channels — Gmail and Facebook included."

One workaround is to use Gmail through Firefox and disable Javascript. While this limits user access to many components of popular websites, it will protect against the potential threat.

Sentry Posts Blog

Sentry Posts Blog
Guarding the network

What you need to know — and what you and your peers have to tell us — about security management in our new community group blog

Read more +

The power of cross-site scripting
Developers at many large enterprises are not aware of the power of cross-site scripting, said Pure Hacking's Gatford. "In the last year or so, [XSS vulnerabilities] have been used by attackers to grab cookie values and therefore gain access to normally password-protected sites."

"When you have organisations like Google spending countless man hours reducing security vulnerabilities... you can imagine how bad the actual situation is for other organisations," said Gatford.

Gatford advised organisations to use resources such as OWASP, which offers free tools to help write secure code and allow testing for XSS vulnerabilities.

Google was unavailable to comment at the time of writing.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
12 out of 13 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

IS Helpdesk Assistant

The job role would include: managing the IS helpdesk log, working on the 1st line support help desk solving user problems, creating basic HTML ...

Project Manager - Accounts

Computer Futures Solutions are urgently seeking a Project Manger to head up the Accounts Workstream of a major Financial Services provider on the ...

Systems Engineer with Network Design Experience - Contract role - Beds

As they are creating a new management centre, from proof of concept through to deployment, this candidate will have an appreciation of Business ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation