ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Employees blamed for SME security breaches

Tim Ferguson silicon.com

Published: 24 Aug 2007 08:51 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

IT managers in small and medium-sized businesses blame their fellow workers for online security breaches — despite the fact many SMEs still don't enforce web-usage policies.

More than a quarter of European SME IT managers said they believe company employees are responsible for security problems, according to research commissioned by security software company Websense.

The most frustrating problem for IT managers is employee behaviour (cited by nearly a third of managers), followed by security not being high enough on the corporate agenda and then budget constraints.

The survey found nearly a third of employees said they need to access sites known to present a high security risk, such as peer-to-peer services and free software-download sites.

The extent to which workers use the web is highlighted by the finding that European employees spend an average of around two hours per day online at work, with around half-an-hour of that spent browsing non-work-related sites.

But suspicious IT managers believe the time spent on non-work-related sites is closer to 48 minutes — or the equivalent of four hours per week.

The survey also reveals that 23 percent of SMEs have web-security policies but don't require employees to sign up to them. Another 16 percent have no web-usage policy at all, preferring to trust employees to not put them at risk.

The SMB State of Security survey covered 375 IT managers and 375 employees from companies of between 100 and 250 users in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
6 out of 6 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

S55189: Security/Quality Analyst

Experience dealing with IT security controls and the associated policies. Quality - Act as the primary point of contact to ensure that Accenture ...

Security Specialist-00042939

Responsibilities: Security Specialist on the Infrastructure Technical design team will serve in three primary capacities: Subject Matter Expert (SME) ...

Solutions Architect (Infrastructure)

The successful candidate will work closely with peer solution architects and lead teams to ensure that projects are robustly governed to deliver high ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation