ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Licensing issues delay vPro security

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 22 Aug 2007 09:05 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Symantec has delayed its virtualised security system for Intel's vPro platform because of licensing issues around the Windows CE platform, the company said on Tuesday.

The delay is the latest setback for vPro, a bundle of Intel technologies aimed at business users. Among vPro's capabilities are virtualisation — which is built into the Core chips used in vPro — and the ability for management tools to access features that are outside the control of the main operating system.

The vPro brand, along with the Viiv consumer platform, was part of Intel's attempt to recreate the success of the Centrino mobile wireless platform for laptops. In July Intel said it will begin de-emphasising vPro and Viiv from next year, in favour of the better-known Core brand.

Symantec's Virtual Security Solution (VSS) is designed to run on a virtual appliance outside the main OS, making it harder for users or attackers to get at.

The problem, Symantec said, is not the software itself, but the tangled licensing issues surrounding virtualisation.

"The first version of this product is actually ready to go. The code is written and we feel the product is in great shape," Gary Sabala, product manager for Virtual Security Solutions, told ZDNet.co.uk. "However, while the product may be ready, we've discovered what other companies have also discovered when it comes to dealing with a virtual environment: that leveraging virtualisation makes licensing a bit more challenging."

He said the VSS would be released "as soon as possible", suggesting it could be available in mid-2008.

The licensing issues involved specifically relate to the Windows CE software, which currently provides the platform for all vPro virtual appliances. Other third-party licensing issues are also causing problems, Symantec said. The company is working to make the VSS run on open-source software as a way of getting around those licensing issues, Sabala said.

In May, Intel and Red Hat said they were developing a platform for vPro virtual appliances that is based on Linux and the Xen hypervisor, and would aim to have the technology ready by 2008. The move toward open source was the result of pressure by software vendors to move toward a "standards-based approach" for the vPro virtual appliances, Intel said at the time.

Besides Symantec, vendors such as PGP, StarCat, Altiris, Criston, LANDesk and Microsoft are working on management tools for vPro.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
8 out of 8 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

C# Winforms developer- Cambridge- 6 month contract

Winforms development 2.0 - Candidates coming from a previous C++ background is would be nice and any experience working with Windows CE and/or ...

PDA .Net Developer (South East Mids)

Experience of working with pocket PCs or PDA devices from a Windows CE platform will be required. A manufacturing business client is currently in the ...

C#.NET DEVELOPER / 12 MONTH CONTRACT / I PAY MORE THAN OTHERS AGENCIES

Experience in Symbian OS and/or Windows Mobile (Window CE) and background in C++ Engineering and a Scientific degree is desirable but not necessary. ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation