ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Wi-Fi hack caused TK Maxx security breach

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 08 May 2007 16:13 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Hackers who stole 45 million customer records from the parent company of TK Maxx did so by breaking into the retail company's wireless LAN , it emerged on Monday.

TK Maxx's parent company, TJX, had secured its wireless network using Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) — one of the weakest forms of security for wireless LANs. Hackers broke in and stole the records — which included millions of credit card numbers — in the second half of 2005 and throughout 2006.

According to The Wall Street Journal, hackers cracked the WEP encryption protocol used to transmit data between price-checking devices, cash registers and computers at a store in Minnesota. The intruders then collected information submitted by employees logging on to the company's central database in Massachusetts, stealing usernames and passwords.

With that information, the hackers set up their own accounts on TJX's system. Over the 18-month period, their software collected transaction data, including credit-card numbers, into approximately 100 large files. Transaction data sent to banks, which was unencrypted by TJX, is also believed to have been intercepted by the hackers. According to The Wall Street Journal, the attackers even left encrypted messages on the TJX network to tell each other which files had been copied.

A Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing in March revealed that TJX believed the attackers had stolen information from its computer systems in Watford that process and store payment card transactions for TK Maxx.

TJX also believed data had been stolen from the part of its computer systems in Massachusetts that processes and stores information related to payment card, cheque and unreceipted merchandise-return transactions for US and Puerto Rico customers at a number of its stores. Analysts have estimated the breach will cost the company approximately $1bn (£500m), excluding any litigation costs.

Many security experts have criticised the strength of WEP encryption. WEP was initially cracked in 2001, and most recently broken by German researchers last month, who beat the encryption using an ordinary laptop in under three seconds.

TJX had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
28 out of 29 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Issues like this Arthur B.

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Senior J2EE Developer - Web Based eCommerce Applications, £45k

Working with clients handling some of the highest number of hits for any online shop in Europe, they claim to sell more online than in their high ...

Business Development Manager - Market leaders in Civil Engineering

The parent Group operates in over seven countries with strong ambitions for market share growth in all its markets. Managing sales process from start ...

S&P (Security) IT Specialist

Non Technical skills - Security methods and practices - Data encryption technologies and products - Operational security and trust models - Physical ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation