ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Cisco warns of more router vulnerabilities

Richard Thurston ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 14 Feb 2007 12:24 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The intrusion-prevention capabilities of Cisco's routers are prone to attack, after the networking giant revealed two vulnerabilities in its key operating system.

The vulnerabilities affect those versions of Cisco's Internetwork Operating System (IOS) that start with "12.3" and "12.4". Almost all Cisco routers run a version of IOS. The flaws allow a hacker to circumvent the IPS protection built into the affected routers and also cause routers to crash.

IPS is an inspection feature found in many networking products, including those from Cisco, which aims to block unauthorised network access and malicious code in real time.

In a security advisory, Cisco said there were two vulnerabilities: a fragmented packet evasion weakness, which could lead to the IPS being circumvented, and an ATOMIC.TCP regular expression denial-of-service vulnerability. Exploitation of the first weakness "may result in an attacker being able to evade detection by an IOS IPS device. This could allow protected systems to be covertly attacked," Cisco warned. A hacker exploiting the second vulnerability "may cause an IOS IPS device to crash".

Cisco urged IT managers who run affected routers to patch the IOS.

Last month, Cisco found two other vulnerabilities in IOS. The first weakness could lead to a denial-of-service attack, while the second one allows hackers to execute malicious code on the device in question. Following news of the vulnerabilities, Cisco made patches available.

Cisco's routers are the most popular enterprise routers in the world. As such, IOS is the network operating system that the majority of hackers tries to exploit.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
5 out of 5 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

CCNA/CCNP Cisco Engineer - Routers/Switches/Firewalls - Bath

The ideal candidate will have a skill set to include as many of the following: CCNA or CCNP certified, Routers, Catalyst Switches 29xx, 35xx and ...

3rd Line Network Support, Routers, Cisco CCNA/P, BGP, IPSec, W. Yorks

An excellent opportunity has arisen for an experienced Network Engineer to join the technical support team of a hugely reputable organisation that is ...

Cisco Network Administrator/ CCNP/ Cisco/ Switches/ Routers/40k

Cisco Network Administrator/ CCNP/ Cisco/ Switches/ Routers/Windows Server 2003/ISA/ DNS/ DHCP/ MCP/ 40k Worlds leaders in Downloadable Server Based ...

Sentry Posts Blog

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Indian officials accuse China of cyber...

China is actively engaged in mapping India's computer networks, according to the Times of India. China is mounting "almost daily" attacks against Indian Government computer systems,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation