ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Cybercrime tools get cheaper

Graeme Wearden in San Francisco ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 09 Feb 2007 13:24 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It's becoming cheaper and easier to get hold of the tools needed to launch a cybercrime attack, security firm RSA claimed on Thursday.

Jens Hinrichsen, the company's product marketing manager for fraud auction, said RSA had been monitoring the websites and ICQ channels where malicious hackers and cybercriminals interact. These sites allow participants to share feedback and even review each other's products.

Addressing an audience at the RSA Conference 2007 in San Francisco, Hinrichsen showed several screengrabs to illustrate that the prices being asked for hacking tools have been dropping, with many participants embracing volume discounts and other incentives.

One example was a post offering a "Super Trojan" — which could be used to install malicious code on a victim's PC — for $600 (£307).

"What's interesting is that this is actually a reviewed vendor, whose actually had a lot of good transactions. He's offering this custom piece of crimeware for only $600," said Hinrichsen, who said he "loved the term Super Trojan".

"So, when we talk about the ever-increasing ramp-up of more sophisticated tools, the prices are coming down."

Another example was someone selling email address lists and login details for sites such as eBay.

"For one to ten accounts, this guy would charge you five bucks ($5) per account. But they've got discounted rates, just like any other institution would offer their customers, so if you buy 10 to 50 accounts he'll give it to you for £4.50 each. Fifty more accounts would be $3.50 each," said Hinrichsen.

Other examples shown included a list of 15,000 email addresses, which had all apparently been verified as genuine, for sale for $1,500, a hacked root server for $100 to £150, and someone offering to host a financial scam on his website for $20 per day, or $80 for a week.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
7 out of 7 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Non Trade Accounts Payable Manager London Global Client

Global Client based in the City of London is looking for a Non Trade Accounts Payable Manager. Ideally, 5 years experience is required as well as ...

Analyst Accounts and Billing EXCELLENT Package

Global Legal Client based in Central London is looking for a Financial Analyst within their Accounts and Billing Dept. Duties include: Reporting to ...

Global Client Accounts Payable London

Leading Multinational Client based in London is looking for an Accounts Payable Clerk. Coding of invoices using complex General Ledger Accounts. ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation