ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Crime surge sparks calls for internet Interpol

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 12 Dec 2006 17:15 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Eugene Kaspersky, head of antivirus research at Kaspersky Labs, has called for greater international law enforcement co-operation to combat the growing threat from cybercrime.

"I would like to see more international organisation — some kind of internet Interpol, to react quickly once an infection [or botnet] is known," said Kaspersky, speaking in Moscow last week. "Hackers change proxies quickly, so the police have to be very reactive."

He warned that hackers are typically using different proxy servers distributed around the world to avoid being detected and caught in any one country.

Interpol, which helps national police forces to work together, has a financial and hi-tech crime sub-directorate that investigates cybercrime, including botnet activity. But Kaspersky believes that a more formal body with stronger powers is needed.

According to detective chief inspector Charlie McMurdie of the Metropolitan Police e-crime unit, who is also one of the permanent members of the UK Interpol working group, existing Interpol forums are addressing key priorities in e-crime including botnets, hacker tools and techniques.

"Most of our relationships come through international investigations. If we've got a time-critical case we can pick up the phone and speak to somebody," said McMurdie.

But McMurdie also admitted that she was not happy with the international speed of response in all cases.

"It depends on which country," said McMurdie. "Different countries have different legislation, and we have to be aware of those differences to be able to deliver a timely response. I certainly wouldn't say I'm happy with the speed of response in all cases — we could do an awful lot more to improve relationships with some countries," McMurdie added.

Botnet investigations, which focus on legions of compromised computers that hackers use to launch attacks and steal information, are exceedingly time critical as botnets can change form, composition and international distribution very quickly. Investigations into other vectors of attack show that speed is of the essence in terms of response. Mail security company MessageLabs reported an attack on Tuesday that lasted four seconds and sought to exploit a zero-day vulnerability in Microsoft Word, the second reported within a week, in a highly targeted attack against specific organisations.

Ed Gibson, Microsoft's chief security advisor in the UK, praised law-enforcement efforts, but is unhappy that there is such a disparity in cybercrime legislation and law-enforcement funding around the world.

"Law enforcement and security services are doing the best they can under different legislation, and considering the resources they have," said Gibson.

Kaspersky criticised ineffectual cybercrime laws, especially in Russia where a computer crime investigation can only be initiated on the request of the victim. This means Russian police have their hands tied when investigating Russian hackers, Kaspersky explained.

"Unfortunately in Russia computer laws are not so effective," said Kaspersky. "With the Computer Act, an investigation starts on the request of the victim — but victims don't like to disclose they've been hacked. Banks and companies don't want to disclose their networks have been hacked [due to damage to reputation], and personal users don't care."

"In several cases the police have the address and telephone number of hackers — they know everything about them — but they don't have the request," said Kaspersky.

Kaspersky claimed that Russian hackers are a growing problem, as well as hackers from China and Latin America.

"Russian hackers develop tricky technologies to hide malicious code — mutating utilities that reassemble malicious source code once a computer is infected. Signatures simply don't work, so you have to develop specific anti-mutation code," said Kaspersky.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
303 out of 374 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Help Desk Support

Huntress does not discriminate on the grounds of age, race, gender, disability, creed or sexual orientation and complies with all relevant UK ...

Linux Administrator

An understanding of change control and escalation procedures Exposure to helpdesk / call logging software such as Remedy If available and interested ...

Environmental, Health and Safety Manager role- 45,000

As Environmental, Health and Safety Manager for the site you will be required to have a proven track record in a senior Health and Safety role in an ...

Sentry Posts Blog

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Indian officials accuse China of cyber...

China is actively engaged in mapping India's computer networks, according to the Times of India. China is mounting "almost daily" attacks against Indian Government computer systems,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation