ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Microsoft's Allchin: Vista won't need antivirus

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 10 Nov 2006 15:41 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Microsoft co-president Jim Allchin has suggested that some Vista users will not need to run any third-party antivirus software.

Allchin made the comments in a telephone conference with reporters on Wednesday, according to betanews.com. He said that while there was no way of knowing that security perfection had been achieved in Vista, he was confident enough in the operating system to let his seven-year-old use a locked down version without antivirus.

"My son, seven years old, runs Windows Vista and, honestly, he doesn't have an antivirus system on his machine. His machine is locked down with parental controls, he can't download things unless it's to the places that I've said that he could do, and I'm feeling totally confident about that," said Allchin. "That is quite a statement. I couldn't say that in Windows XP SP2."

Allchin said his confidence in Vista came from new security features, including parental controls and Address Space Layout Randomisation, which is a feature that randomises key data areas in the virtual computer space in an effort to foil hacks based on predictable data storage.

But in a blog posting on Friday evening, Allchin insisted that the security features in Microsoft's upcoming Windows Vista operating system do not negate the need to use third-party antivirus software.

"I want to be clear, most users will use some form of antivirus software, and that will be appropriate for their scenarios," he wrote in the post. Allchin also noted that Windows Security Center encouraged the use of antivirus software.

The Microsoft co-president's comments come at a time when Microsoft is battling security vendors over Vista. McAfee and Symantec have both claimed that they have not been granted access to key parts of the operating system, specifically to the kernel of the 64-bit version of Vista, and claim this will hinder their abilities to produce fully functioning antivirus code.

Both antivirus companies have asserted that they need access to PatchGuard, the part of the operating system designed to prevent malicious attacks, to be able to produce effective code.

"Microsoft has yet to provide the interface — filtering APIs — needed to address the issues created by PatchGuard," a Symantec spokeswoman told ZDNet UK on Thursday. "On the 64-bit version of Vista, our products will protect users as much as possible within the limitations that PatchGuard imposes on the entire security software industry."

Microsoft has also been the subject of an EC anti-competition investigation into Patchguard, but it claims to have addressed the EC's concerns through its work with companies, including McAfee and Symantec, to provide APIs.

Allchin has announced his plans to retire from Microsoft following the commercial availability of Vista.

ZDNet Australia's Steven Deare contributed to this report.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
578 out of 680 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Developer Programs Engineer (Software Engineer) - Java, PHP, Python, Ruby, .NET, JavaScript and Perl. - London

Developer Programs Engineers work with developers to make them successful integrating with Google developer products, tools, and APIs for products ...

C++ Develope with exchange APIs, Multi-threading: XTP trading system

This role requires at least 4 years C++ (server development rather than GUI) preferably VC++ under Windows, 2+ years financial exchange development, ...

SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR

Experience with clustered server environments, Microsoft SQL Server, Sybase, Oracle, RSA Security, Linux, Perl, Citrix, Veritas, BackupExec, Symantec ...

Sentry Posts Blog

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation