ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Subliminal messages come in spam

Peter Judge ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 11 Sep 2006 17:45 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Banned subliminal messages that could potentially manipulate users' subconscious have appeared in spam, according to PandaLabs.

Users opening the message see what appears to be a normal advertisement for online stocks. Yet the message also displays a rapid series of images, for 10 to 40 milliseconds, which include the word "buy", according to PandaLabs.

Controversy has surrounded subliminal messages since they were reportedly tested in advertising in the 1950s in the US. Nobody has ever shown that they work but subliminal images are banned worldwide in TV and cinema advertising.

Even though the spam recipient is not aware of the images, they can be influenced by them without realising it, according to Luis Corrons, director of PandaLabs. "This is the first time we have detected an Internet threat that uses subliminal techniques."

Subliminal techniques could become more sophisticated, he warned. "Think about the damage that this type of message could cause, especially to young users," he said, adding a suggestion that "appropriate security tools which include antispam and content filtering technologies will help prevent threats like this from reaching users' mailboxes."

Only a few examples of subliminal advertising have been tried. Campaigners for President Mitterand reportedly edited single-frame insertions of his portrait into French news broadcasts in 1988, while police in America tried to use the technique to catch a serial killer in 1978. Kansas TV station KAKE-TV transmitted a subliminal message for the murderer to turn himself in: his subsequent arrest in 2005 is not thought to be connected to the experiment.

 

 

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
277 out of 400 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Websphere Message Broker Consultant

My client, a financial insitution requires a Websphere Message Broker consultant to join their programme. Ideal candidates will have excellent ...

Junior QA Analyst - Advertising Agency - London c25k

Fantastic opportunity for a QA Analyst to join a small QA team in a Junior capacity to help drive their Testing function forward. You will be ...

Marketing / Advertising High Tech Java Developer - 45K Manchester

A fantastic position has arisen for a Java Developer to work for a Marketing / Advertising company who are expanding and now recruiting a Java ...

Sentry Posts Blog

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Indian officials accuse China of cyber...

China is actively engaged in mapping India's computer networks, according to the Times of India. China is mounting "almost daily" attacks against Indian Government computer systems,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation